View : 297 Download: 177

Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Korean Cohort Study

Title
Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Korean Cohort Study
Authors
Kim, Chaeyoon; Chang, Junhyuk; Gan, Sujin; Park, Sohyeon; Park, Kalynn; Kim, Hong-Ah; Park, Rae Woong; Rhie, Sandy Jeong
Ewha Authors
이정연
SCOPUS Author ID
이정연scopus
Issue Date
2025
Journal Title
PHARMACEUTICALS
ISSN
1424-8247JCR Link
Citation
PHARMACEUTICALS vol. 18, no. 12
Keywords
cardiovascular events; elderly; peripheral artery disease; statin; type 2 diabetes
Publisher
MDPI
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are indicated for cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) but may differ in clinical effectiveness and safety. This study compared real-world cardiovascular and safety outcomes associated with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with T2D, with an emphasis on older adults. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from 10 Korean hospitals standardized to the Common Data Model. Adults (>= 18 years) with T2D who were newly prescribed rosuvastatin or atorvastatin were included. After propensity score matching, primary outcomes (myocardial infarction [MI], heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and in-hospital death), secondary outcomes (peripheral arterial disease [PAD] and glaucoma), and safety outcomes (acute kidney injury, cataract, and myalgia) were compared. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted among patients aged >= 65 years. Results: Among 49,034 patients (rosuvastatin, 16,123; atorvastatin, 32,911), baseline characteristics were well balanced. Across all participating hospitals, the comparative analyses showed no meaningful differences in cardiovascular or safety outcomes between the two statins. However, among patients aged >= 65 years, rosuvastatin was associated with a higher risk of PAD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.38), and this finding was consistent in sensitivity analysis (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.01-1.70). Conclusions: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated comparable cardiovascular effectiveness and safety. Although rosuvastatin was associated with a modestly higher incidence of PAD in older adults, the difference was small. From a clinical perspective, these findings underscore the importance of individualized statin therapy tailored to patient-specific factors such as age, comorbidity, and vascular health. Overall, both statins provide overall therapeutic equivalence for cardiovascular prevention.
DOI
10.3390/ph18121860
Appears in Collections:
약학대학 > 약학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
pharmaceuticals-18-01860.pdf(4.05 MB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE