View : 296 Download: 177

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이정연*
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-23T16:31:09Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-23T16:31:09Z-
dc.date.issued2025*
dc.identifier.issn1424-8247*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-38847*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/274675-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are indicated for cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) but may differ in clinical effectiveness and safety. This study compared real-world cardiovascular and safety outcomes associated with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with T2D, with an emphasis on older adults. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from 10 Korean hospitals standardized to the Common Data Model. Adults (>= 18 years) with T2D who were newly prescribed rosuvastatin or atorvastatin were included. After propensity score matching, primary outcomes (myocardial infarction [MI], heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and in-hospital death), secondary outcomes (peripheral arterial disease [PAD] and glaucoma), and safety outcomes (acute kidney injury, cataract, and myalgia) were compared. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted among patients aged >= 65 years. Results: Among 49,034 patients (rosuvastatin, 16,123; atorvastatin, 32,911), baseline characteristics were well balanced. Across all participating hospitals, the comparative analyses showed no meaningful differences in cardiovascular or safety outcomes between the two statins. However, among patients aged >= 65 years, rosuvastatin was associated with a higher risk of PAD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.38), and this finding was consistent in sensitivity analysis (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.01-1.70). Conclusions: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated comparable cardiovascular effectiveness and safety. Although rosuvastatin was associated with a modestly higher incidence of PAD in older adults, the difference was small. From a clinical perspective, these findings underscore the importance of individualized statin therapy tailored to patient-specific factors such as age, comorbidity, and vascular health. Overall, both statins provide overall therapeutic equivalence for cardiovascular prevention.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherMDPI*
dc.subjectcardiovascular events*
dc.subjectelderly*
dc.subjectperipheral artery disease*
dc.subjectstatin*
dc.subjecttype 2 diabetes*
dc.titleRosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Korean Cohort Study*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue12*
dc.relation.volume18*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.journaltitlePHARMACEUTICALS*
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ph18121860*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001646550100001*
dc.author.googleKim, Chaeyoon*
dc.author.googleChang, Junhyuk*
dc.author.googleGan, Sujin*
dc.author.googlePark, Sohyeon*
dc.author.googlePark, Kalynn*
dc.author.googleKim, Hong-Ah*
dc.author.googlePark, Rae Woong*
dc.author.googleRhie, Sandy Jeong*
dc.contributor.scopusid이정연(57191753089)*
dc.date.modifydate20260630164737*


qrcode

BROWSE