View : 542 Download: 357

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박지현*
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-27T16:31:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-27T16:31:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024*
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-36048*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/270028-
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades, the issue of building energy usage has become increasingly significant, and U-values for building envelopes have been key parameters in predicting building energy consumption. This study comprehensively reviews the U-values (thermal transmittances) of building envelopes made from conventional and bio-based materials. First, it introduces existing studies related to the theoretical and measured U-values for four types of building envelopes: concrete, brick, timber, and straw bale envelopes. Compared with concrete and brick envelopes, timber and straw bale envelopes have lower U-values. The differences between the measured and theoretical U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes are minor. The theoretical U-values of concrete and brick envelopes ranged from 0.12 to 2.09 W/m2K, and the measured U-values of concrete and brick envelopes ranged from 0.14 to 5.45 W/m2K. The theoretical U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes ranged from 0.092 to 1.10 W/m2K, and the measured U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes ranged from 0.04 to 1.30 W/m2K. Second, this paper analyses the environmental factors influencing U-values, including temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation. Third, the relationship between U-values and building energy consumption is also analysed. Finally, the theoretical and measured U-values of different envelopes are compared. Three research findings in U-values for building envelopes are summarised: (1) the relationship between environmental factors and U-values needs to be studied in detail; (2) the gaps between theoretical and measured U-values are significant, especially for concrete and brick envelopes; (3) the accuracy of both theoretical and the measured U-values needs to be verified. © 2024 by the authors.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)*
dc.subjectbrick envelopes*
dc.subjectbuilding energy*
dc.subjectconcrete envelopes*
dc.subjectstraw bale envelopes*
dc.subjecttimber envelopes*
dc.subjectU-values*
dc.titleU-Values for Building Envelopes of Different Materials: A Review*
dc.typeReview*
dc.relation.issue8*
dc.relation.volume14*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.journaltitleBuildings*
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings14082434*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001305094700001*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85202880870*
dc.author.googleYu*
dc.author.googleJiaqi*
dc.author.googleDong*
dc.author.googleWang*
dc.author.googleTsung-Hsien*
dc.author.googleChang*
dc.author.googleWen-Shao*
dc.author.googlePark*
dc.author.googleJihyun*
dc.contributor.scopusid박지현(56039482900)*
dc.date.modifydate20260211155921*


qrcode

BROWSE