Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 박지현 | * |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-27T16:31:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-27T16:31:05Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | * |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-5309 | * |
| dc.identifier.other | OAK-36048 | * |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/270028 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent decades, the issue of building energy usage has become increasingly significant, and U-values for building envelopes have been key parameters in predicting building energy consumption. This study comprehensively reviews the U-values (thermal transmittances) of building envelopes made from conventional and bio-based materials. First, it introduces existing studies related to the theoretical and measured U-values for four types of building envelopes: concrete, brick, timber, and straw bale envelopes. Compared with concrete and brick envelopes, timber and straw bale envelopes have lower U-values. The differences between the measured and theoretical U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes are minor. The theoretical U-values of concrete and brick envelopes ranged from 0.12 to 2.09 W/m2K, and the measured U-values of concrete and brick envelopes ranged from 0.14 to 5.45 W/m2K. The theoretical U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes ranged from 0.092 to 1.10 W/m2K, and the measured U-values of timber and straw bale envelopes ranged from 0.04 to 1.30 W/m2K. Second, this paper analyses the environmental factors influencing U-values, including temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation. Third, the relationship between U-values and building energy consumption is also analysed. Finally, the theoretical and measured U-values of different envelopes are compared. Three research findings in U-values for building envelopes are summarised: (1) the relationship between environmental factors and U-values needs to be studied in detail; (2) the gaps between theoretical and measured U-values are significant, especially for concrete and brick envelopes; (3) the accuracy of both theoretical and the measured U-values needs to be verified. © 2024 by the authors. | * |
| dc.language | English | * |
| dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | * |
| dc.subject | brick envelopes | * |
| dc.subject | building energy | * |
| dc.subject | concrete envelopes | * |
| dc.subject | straw bale envelopes | * |
| dc.subject | timber envelopes | * |
| dc.subject | U-values | * |
| dc.title | U-Values for Building Envelopes of Different Materials: A Review | * |
| dc.type | Review | * |
| dc.relation.issue | 8 | * |
| dc.relation.volume | 14 | * |
| dc.relation.index | SCIE | * |
| dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | * |
| dc.relation.journaltitle | Buildings | * |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/buildings14082434 | * |
| dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:001305094700001 | * |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85202880870 | * |
| dc.author.google | Yu | * |
| dc.author.google | Jiaqi | * |
| dc.author.google | Dong | * |
| dc.author.google | Wang | * |
| dc.author.google | Tsung-Hsien | * |
| dc.author.google | Chang | * |
| dc.author.google | Wen-Shao | * |
| dc.author.google | Park | * |
| dc.author.google | Jihyun | * |
| dc.contributor.scopusid | 박지현(56039482900) | * |
| dc.date.modifydate | 20260211155921 | * |