View : 172 Download: 0

Gaussian process regression-driven deep drawing blank design method

Title
Gaussian process regression-driven deep drawing blank design method
Authors
LeeSeungroLimYoungbinGaldosLanderTaeyongQuagliatoLuca
Ewha Authors
이태용Luca Quagliato
SCOPUS Author ID
이태용scopus; Luca Quagliatoscopus
Issue Date
2024
Journal Title
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
ISSN
0020-7403JCR Link
Citation
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences vol. 265
Keywords
Blank design mapping functionDeep drawingFinite element analysisGaussian process regressionMachine learningParametric design
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This research introduces a machine learning (ML)-based methodology for the optimal blank design of components manufactured through the deep drawing process, considering the interplay among material, process, and geometric parameters. The proposed blank design mapping function (BDMF) leverages a Gaussian process regression (GPR) ML model in conjunction with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. This combination allows for correlating predictions with their standard deviations, capturing the estimations' quality effectively. The GPR model was trained using the results from a three-dimensional adaptive mesh-based finite element analysis (FEA) model, characterized by a fixed node count of 23 input parameters, an explicit solution scheme, and an average computational time of 270 s. Laboratory-scale experiments on an R47.5 mm flanged cup constructed from AISI-304 steel and AA5754 aluminum alloy served to validate the FEA models and the proposed BDMF. The comparison between experimental outcomes and FEA results revealed maximum deviations of 13.3 % in the drawing force and 0.35 % for the earing profile over a 90° segment. The comparison between experimental data and BDMF predictions for the sheet metal blank indicated average deviations of 0.015 mm (or 1.3 %) in estimating thickness and 0.12 mm (or 0.25 %) in predicting the outer radius. Application of the BDMF to four additional flanged geometries with varying shapes demonstrated its reliability and generality; the maximum and average deviations for the earing profile were 4.3 % and 3.1 %, respectively, and for post-forming sheet thickness, they were 6.7 % and 3.1 %, respectively. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
DOI
10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108898
Appears in Collections:
공과대학 > 휴먼기계바이오공학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE