View : 791 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정선옥*
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T16:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-13T16:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020*
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-27254*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/254934-
dc.description.abstractAims and Objectives: To evaluate the psychometric quality of two single-item pain-intensity measures: the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Background: Measuring pain intensity is a vital step in initiating symptom management and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions with cancer patients. Single-item pain-intensity measures of the NRS and VRS format have been evaluated to be acceptable for use in clinical practice and research; however, evidence to choose one over the other, as a standardised pain-assessment format, is insufficient. Design: Descriptive correlational study. The study was guided and reported following the STROBE guideline. Methods: Data accrued at two time points during cancer treatment with a total of 249 patients treated in a Korean University Hospital. Two single-item measures were constructed to assess pain intensity over 1 week. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; pain intensity subscale and interference subscale) and the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue were the criterion. Convergent and concurrent validity were tested with Pearson's correlations. Results: In the convergent-validity evaluation of the cross-sectional association with the BPI, the NRS showed a much higher level of association than the VRS (0.81 versus 0.61). In convergent validity with a longitudinal association with the BPI, the NRS score change had a much higher level of association (0.61 versus 0.37). In concurrent-validity evaluation, the NRS and VRS showed similar levels of associations with fatigue (−0.48 versus −0.49). Yet, the NRS showed statistically higher levels of correlation with functional limitations than the VRS (0.55 versus 0.42), comparable to the concurrent validity of the BPI. Conclusion: The NRS showed higher validity than VRS when assessing overall pain intensity over the past week. Relevance to Clinical Nursing: Pain assessment is a vital role of nurses in caring for patients with cancer. Current study findings support the use of the single-item NRS pain measure to assess global pain intensity over the past week. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd*
dc.subjectassessment*
dc.subjectcancer*
dc.subjectfatigue*
dc.subjectmeasures*
dc.subjectoncology nursing*
dc.subjectpain*
dc.subjectpsychometrics*
dc.titleComparative evaluations of single-item pain-intensity measures in cancer patients: Numeric rating scale vs. verbal rating scale*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue15-16*
dc.relation.volume29*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSSCI*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage2945*
dc.relation.lastpage2952*
dc.relation.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Nursing*
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.15341*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85086131974*
dc.author.googleKim H.-J.*
dc.author.googleJung S.-O.*
dc.contributor.scopusid정선옥(57214691064)*
dc.date.modifydate20240304131408*
Appears in Collections:
간호대학 > 간호학전공 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE