View : 992 Download: 0
Predictors of Clinical Progression of Subjective Memory Impairment in Elderly Subjects: Data from the Clinical Research Centers for Dementia of South Korea (CREDOS)
- Title
- Predictors of Clinical Progression of Subjective Memory Impairment in Elderly Subjects: Data from the Clinical Research Centers for Dementia of South Korea (CREDOS)
- Authors
- Hong, Yun Jeong; Yoon, Bora; Shim, Yong S.; Kim, Seon-Ok; Kim, Hwa Jung; Choi, Seong Hye; Jeong, Jee Hyang; Yoon, Soo Jin; Yang, Dong Won; Lee, Jae-Hong
- Ewha Authors
- 정지향
- SCOPUS Author ID
- 정지향
- Issue Date
- 2015
- Journal Title
- DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
- ISSN
- 1420-8008
1421-9824
- Citation
- DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS vol. 40, no. 42067, pp. 158 - 165
- Keywords
- Subjective memory impairment; Mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; Progression; Predictors
- Publisher
- KARGER
- Indexed
- SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS
- Document Type
- Article
- Abstract
- Background/Aims: The aims of this study were to determine baseline factors related to the progression of subjective memory impairment (SMI) in elderly subjects and to develop a new modeling scale to predict progression. Methods: Elderly subjects with SMI were recruited from the nationwide Clinical Research Centers for Dementia of South Korea (CREDOS) multicenter cohort and divided into two groups: (1) progressed to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease or (2) stable without progression. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared between the groups, and the most relevant predictors of progression were assessed. A new modeling scale combining the predictors was developed. Results: In total, 129 subjects with SMI were analyzed. The follow-up duration was 0.5-4.7 years, and the median time to event was 3.64 years. The progressing group (n = 29) differed from the stable group (n = 100) in terms of baseline age, apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) status, and some cognitive domains. Older age, a lower Mini-Mental State Examination recall score, APOE4 carrier, and a lower verbal delayed recall score were the most relevant predictors of progression, and a new modeling scale with these 4 predictors provided a better explanation of progression. Conclusion: SMI subjects with a higher risk of progression can be identified using a new modeling scale and might need further evaluations and more frequent follow-up. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
- DOI
- 10.1159/000430807
- Appears in Collections:
- 의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML