View : 501 Download: 0
Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children
- Title
- Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children
- Authors
- Choi, Byung-Moon; Lee, Hyun-Gu; Byon, Hyo-Jin; Lee, Soo-Han; Lee, Eun-Kyung; Kim, Hee-Soo; Noh, Gyu-Jeong
- Ewha Authors
- 이은경
- SCOPUS Author ID
- 이은경


- Issue Date
- 2015
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
- ISSN
- 1567-567X
1573-8744
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 163 - 177
- Keywords
- Propofol; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics
- Publisher
- SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
- Indexed
- SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS

- Document Type
- Article
- Abstract
- There have been no pharmacokinetic parameters and blood-brain equilibration rate constant (k (e0)) of propofol obtained in a single population of children, by which propofol can be administered using a target effect-site concentration controlled infusion. Thirty-nine, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-2 children aged 2-12 years were given an intravenous bolus of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)), followed by infusion (200 A mu g kg(-1) min(-1)). Arterial drug concentrations and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. External model validation was performed in a separate population of children. A two-compartment model and a sigmoid E (max) model directly linked by an effect compartment well described the time courses of propofol concentration and BIS. The estimates of parameters were: V (1) (L) = 1.69, V (2) (L) = 27.2 + 0.929 x (weight - 25), Cl (L min(-1)) = 0.893 x (weight/23.6)(0.966), Q (L min(-1)) = 1.3; E (0) = 76.9; E (max) = 35.4, Ce (50) (mu g mL(-1)) = 3.47 - (0.095 x age) - (1.63 x mean infusion rate of remifentanil in A mu g kg(-1) min(-1)); gamma = 2.1; and k (e0) (min(-1)) = 0.371. Pooled biases (95 % CI) of the target effect-site concentration controlled infusion system of propofol was -20.2 % (-23.3 to -18.1 %) and pooled inaccuracy was 30.4 % (28.6-32.7 %). Pooled biases of BIS prediction was -6.8 % (-9.1 to -4.1 %) and pooled inaccuracies was 19.1 % (17.5-20.9 %).The altered weight-based dose requirements of propofol are well described pharmacokinetically, and pharmacodynamically. Predictive performances of the TCI system in this study were clinically acceptable.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10928-015-9408-2
- Appears in Collections:
- 자연과학대학 > 통계학전공 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML