View : 74 Download: 0

Survival Outcomes Based on Axillary Surgery in Ductal Carcinoma<i> In</i><i> Situ:</i> A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society

Title
Survival Outcomes Based on Axillary Surgery in Ductal Carcinoma<i> In</i><i> Situ:</i> A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society
Authors
Kim, Bong KyunWoo, JoohyunLee, JeeyeonKang, EunhyeBaek, Soo YeonLee, SeokwonLee, Hyouk JinLee, JinaSun, Woo Young|Korean Breast Canc Soc
Ewha Authors
우주현
SCOPUS Author ID
우주현scopus
Issue Date
2024
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER
ISSN
1738-6756JCR Link

2092-9900JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1 - 13
Keywords
CarcinomaIntraductalNoninfiltratingMastectomySentinel Lymph NodeSurvival
Publisher
KOREAN BREAST CANCER SOC
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS; KCI WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose: In total mastectomy (TM), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended but can be omitted for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, concerns regarding SLNB-related complications and their impact on quality of life exist. Consequently, further research is required to evaluate the role of axillary surgeries, including SLNB, in the treatment of TM. We aimed to explore the clinicopathological factors and outcomes associated with axillary surgery in patients with a final diagnosis of pure DCIS who underwent BCS or TM. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed large-scale data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society registration database, highlighting on patients diagnosed with pure DCIS who underwent surgery and were categorized into two groups: BCS and TM. Patients were further categorized into surgery and non-surgery groups according to their axillary surgery status. The analysis compared clinicopathological factors and outcomes according to axillary surgery status between the BCS and TM groups. Results: Among 18,196 patients who underwent surgery for DCIS between 1981 and 2022, 11,872 underwent BCS and 6,324 underwent TM. Both groups leaned towards axillary surgery more frequently for large tumors. In the BCS group, clinical lymph node status was associated with axillary surgery (odds ratio, 11.101; p = 0.003). However, in the TM group, no significant differences in these factors were observed. Survival rates did not vary between groups according to axillary surgery performance. Conclusion: The decision to perform axillary surgery in patients with a final diagnosis of pure DCIS does not affect the prognosis, regardless of the breast surgical method. Furthermore, regardless of the breast surgical method, axillary surgery, including SLNB, should be considered for high-risk patients, such as those with large tumors. This may reduce unnecessary axillary surgery and enhance the patients' quality of life.
DOI
10.4048/jbc.2023.0221|http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.0221
Appears in Collections:
ETC > ETC
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE