View : 262 Download: 60

A review on QST–FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation

Title
A review on QST–FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
Authors
Chung M.Y.Merilä J.Kim Y.Mao K.López-Pujol J.Chung M.G.
Ewha Authors
김유섭
SCOPUS Author ID
김유섭scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
Ecology and Evolution
ISSN
2045-7758JCR Link
Citation
Ecology and Evolution vol. 13, no. 3
Keywords
adaptive variationconservationgenetic diversityherbaceous plantsneutral variationwoody species
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Review
Abstract
Increased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging the gap between conservation science and practice, we outline how conservation practitioners can more efficiently employ population genetic information in plant conservation. We first review the current knowledge about neutral genetic variation (NGV) and adaptive genetic variation (AGV) in seed plants, regarding both within-population and among-population components. We then introduce the estimates of among-population genetic differentiation in quantitative traits (QST) and neutral markers (FST) to plant biology and summarize conservation applications derived from QST–FST comparisons, particularly on how to capture most AGV and NGV on both in-situ and ex-situ programs. Based on a review of published studies, we found that, on average, two and four populations would be needed for woody perennials (n = 18) to capture 99% of NGV and AGV, respectively, whereas four populations would be needed in case of herbaceous perennials (n = 14). On average, QST is about 3.6, 1.5, and 1.1 times greater than FST in woody plants, annuals, and herbaceous perennials, respectively. Hence, conservation and management policies or suggestions based solely on inference on FST could be misleading, particularly in woody species. To maximize the preservation of the maximum levels of both AGV and NGV, we suggest using maximum QST rather than average QST. We recommend conservation managers and practitioners consider this when formulating further conservation and restoration plans for plant species, particularly woody species. © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
DOI
10.1002/ece3.9926
Appears in Collections:
자연과학대학 > 생명과학전공 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
Ecology and Evolution - 2023 - Chung.pdf(802.1 kB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE