View : 457 Download: 0

Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance

Title
Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
Authors
Yum, HaeunKim, HyangLee, TaeyongPark, Moon SeokLee, Seung Yeol
Ewha Authors
이태용
SCOPUS Author ID
이태용scopus
Issue Date
2021
Journal Title
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
ISSN
1471-2474JCR Link
Citation
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS vol. 22, no. 1
Keywords
Cycling kinematicsMusculoskeletal rehabilitationRange of motion
Publisher
BMC
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background Stationary cycling is commonly used for postoperative rehabilitation of physical disabilities; however, few studies have focused on the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of rehabilitation. This study aimed to elucidate the three-dimensional lower limb kinematics of people with healthy musculoskeletal function and the effect of sex and age on kinematics using a controlled bicycle configuration. Methods Thirty-one healthy adults participated in the study. The position of the stationary cycle was standardized using the LeMond method by setting the saddle height to 85.5% of the participant's inseam. The participants maintained a pedaling rate of 10-12 km/h, and the average value of three successive cycles of the right leg was used for analysis. The pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle joint motions during cycling were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. Kinematic data were normalized to 0-100% of the cycling cycle. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and k-fold cross-validation were used to analyze the data. Results In the sagittal plane, the cycling ranges of motion (ROMs) were 1.6 degrees (pelvis), 43.9 degrees (hip), 75.2 degrees (knee), and 26.9 degrees (ankle). The coronal plane movement was observed in all joints, and the specific ROMs were 6.6 degrees (knee) and 5.8 degrees (ankle). There was significant internal and external rotation of the hip (ROM: 11.6 degrees), knee (ROM: 6.6 degrees), and ankle (ROM: 10.3 degrees) during cycling. There was no difference in kinematic data of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle between the sexes (p = 0.12 to 0.95) and between different age groups (p = 0.11 to 0.96) in all anatomical planes. Conclusions The kinematic results support the view that cycling is highly beneficial for comprehensive musculoskeletal rehabilitation. These results might help clinicians set a target of recovery ROM based on healthy and non-elite individuals and issue suitable guidelines to patients.
DOI
10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2
Appears in Collections:
공과대학 > 휴먼기계바이오공학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE