View : 679 Download: 0

Atherogenic index of plasma and the risk of rapid progression of coronary atherosclerosis beyond traditional risk factors

Title
Atherogenic index of plasma and the risk of rapid progression of coronary atherosclerosis beyond traditional risk factors
Authors
Won K.-B.Heo R.Park H.-B.Lee B.K.Lin F.Y.Hadamitzky M.Kim Y.-J.Sung J.M.Conte E.Andreini D.Pontone G.Budoff M.J.Gottlieb I.Chun E.J.Cademartiri F.Maffei E.Marques H.de Araújo Gonçalves P.Leipsic J.A.Lee S.-E.Shin S.Choi J.H.Virmani R.Samady H.Chinnaiyan K.Berman D.S.Narula J.Shaw L.J.Bax J.J.Min J.K.Chang H.-J.
Ewha Authors
신상훈이상은
SCOPUS Author ID
신상훈scopus; 이상은scopus
Issue Date
2021
Journal Title
Atherosclerosis
ISSN
0021-9150JCR Link
Citation
Atherosclerosis vol. 324, pp. 46 - 51
Keywords
Atherogenic index of plasmaAtherosclerosisCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography angiography
Publisher
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background and aims: The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) has been suggested as a marker of plasma atherogenicity. This study aimed to assess the association between AIP and the rapid progression of coronary atherosclerosis using serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods: A total of 1488 adults (60.9 ± 9.2 years, 58.9% male) who underwent serial CCTA with a median inter-scan period of 3.4 years were included. AIP was defined as the base 10 logarithm of the ratio of the concentrations of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Rapid plaque progression (RPP) was defined as the change of percentage atheroma volume (PAV) ≥1.0%/year. All participants were divided into three groups based on AIP tertiles. Results: Baseline total PAV (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) (%) (group I [lowest]: 1.91 [0.00, 6.21] vs. group II: 2.82 [0.27, 8.83] vs. group III [highest]: 2.70 [0.41, 7.50]), the annual change of total PAV (median [IQR]) (%/year) (group I: 0.27 [0.00, 0.81] vs. group II: 0.37 [0.04, 1.11] vs. group III: 0.45 [0.06, 1.25]), and the incidence of RPP (group I: 19.7% vs. group II: 27.3% vs. group III: 31.4%) were significantly different among AIP tertiles (all p < 0.05). In multiple logistic regression analysis, the risk of RPP was increased in group III (odds ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–2.26; p = 0.042) compared to group I after adjusting for clinical factors and baseline total PAV. Conclusions: Based on serial CCTA findings, AIP is an independent predictive marker for RPP beyond traditional risk factors. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
DOI
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.03.009
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE