Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 성지은 | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-19T16:31:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-19T16:31:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | * |
dc.identifier.issn | 1092-4388 | * |
dc.identifier.issn | 1558-9102 | * |
dc.identifier.other | OAK-25775 | * |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/252092 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study assessed the reliability and validity of intermodality associations and differences in persons with aphasia (PWA) and healthy controls (HC) on a computerized listening and 3 reading versions of the Revised Token Test (RTT; McNeil & Prescott, 1978). Method: Thirty PWA and 30 HC completed the test versions, including a complete replication. Reading versions varied according to stimulus presentation method: (a) full-sentence presentation, (b) self-paced word-by-word fullsentence construction, and (c) self-paced word-by-word presentation with each word removed with the onset of the next word. Participants also received tests of aphasia and reading severity. Results: The listening version produced higher overall mean scores than each of the reading versions. Differences were small and within 1 standard error of measurement of each version. Overall score test-retest reliability among versions for PWA ranged from r =.89 to r = .97. Correlations between the listening and reading versions ranged from r = .79 to r = .85. All versions correlated highly with aphasia and reading severity. Correlations were generally low for the HC due to restricted variability. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor solution for PWA and a single-factor for HC. Conclusions: Intermodality differences were small, and all 4 versions were reliable, concurrently valid, and sensitive to similar linguistic processing difficulties in PWA. | * |
dc.language | English | * |
dc.publisher | AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC | * |
dc.title | Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia | * |
dc.type | Article | * |
dc.relation.issue | 2 | * |
dc.relation.volume | 58 | * |
dc.relation.index | SCIE | * |
dc.relation.index | SSCI | * |
dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | * |
dc.relation.startpage | 311 | * |
dc.relation.lastpage | 324 | * |
dc.relation.journaltitle | JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | * |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0030 | * |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000357118000012 | * |
dc.author.google | McNeil, Malcolm R. | * |
dc.author.google | Pratt, Sheila R. | * |
dc.author.google | Szuminsky, Neil | * |
dc.author.google | Sung, Jee Eun | * |
dc.author.google | Fossett, Tepanta R. D. | * |
dc.author.google | Fassbinder, Wiltrud | * |
dc.author.google | Lim, Kyoung Yuel | * |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 성지은(21735141600) | * |
dc.date.modifydate | 20240130114736 | * |