View : 848 Download: 0

Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing

Title
Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing
Authors
Yang, HwajinYang, Sujin
Ewha Authors
양수진
SCOPUS Author ID
양수진scopus
Issue Date
2017
Journal Title
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION
ISSN
1366-7289JCR Link

1469-1841JCR Link
Citation
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 184 - 196
Keywords
bilingualismworking memorycontrolled attentionexecutive attentioninterference
Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Indexed
SSCI; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
We investigated bilingual advantages in general control abilities using three complex-span tasks of working memory (WM). An operation-span task served as a baseline measure of WM capacity. Additionally, two modified versions of the Stroop-span task were designed to place varying attentional-control demands during memoranda encoding by asking participants either to read the to-be-remembered item aloud (lower cognitive control; i.e., Stroop-span task) or to name the font color of the to-be-remembered item while still encoding the word for later recall (greater cognitive control; i.e., attention-impeded Stroop-span task). Twenty-six Korean-English bilinguals and 25 English-native monolinguals were tested. We found that bilinguals outperformed monolinguals on the attention-impeded Stroop-span task, but on neither the operation-span nor the Stroop-span task. Our findings demonstrate that bilingualism provides advantages in controlled processing, an important component of WM and other executive functions, suggesting that the demand for controlled processing in WM tasks moderates bilingual effects on WM.
DOI
10.1017/S1366728915000632
Appears in Collections:
사회과학대학 > 심리학전공 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE