View : 681 Download: 0

Differential effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimen on clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Title
Differential effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimen on clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
Authors
Kim, EunjiKim, KyuboOh, Do HoonHan, Sae-WonKim, Tae-YouJung, Seung-YongPark, Kyu JooKang, Gyeong HoonChie, Eui Kyu
Ewha Authors
김규보
SCOPUS Author ID
김규보scopus
Issue Date
2019
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF BUON
ISSN
1107-0625JCR Link

2241-6293JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF BUON vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 470 - 478
Keywords
chemoradiotherapychemotherapy regimenneoadjuvantrectal cancer
Publisher
IMPRIMATUR PUBLICATIONS
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential effect of chemotherapy regimen in preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The medical records of 279 patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery for cT3/4 rectal cancer from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-four patients were treated with one cycle of i.v. bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) during 1st week (group A), 214 patients with two cycles of i.v. bolus 5-FU during 1st and 5th week (group B), and 31 patients with oral capecitabine on the days with radiotherapy (group C). Propensity score matching was performed between three groups. Results: Median follow-up was 60.1 months. Five-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.2, 83.3, 75.0, and 84.5%, respectively. Thirty-one patients per group were allocated to three groups via propensity score matching. On univariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy regimen was not a significant prognostic factor for survival outcomes in the matched group analysis (OS, p=0.175; DFS, p=0.481; DMFS, p=0.515; LRFS, p=0.456). In addition, there was no significant difference in the sphincter preserving surgery rate, circumferential resection margin status, and pathologic response between three groups (p=0.441, 1.000, 0.818, respectively). As regards to treatment-related toxicity, 9 patients showed grade 3 neutropenia in group B, while there was no grade 3 or higher toxicity in groups A and C. Conclusion: The concurrent chemotherapy regimen (5-FU #1 vs 5-FU #2 vs capecitabine) did not have a significant effect on treatment outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT.
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE