View : 119 Download: 0

Prevalidation trial for a novel in vitro eye irritation test using the reconstructed human cornea-like epithelial model, MCTT HCE (TM)

Title
Prevalidation trial for a novel in vitro eye irritation test using the reconstructed human cornea-like epithelial model, MCTT HCE (TM)
Authors
Yang, HyeriKim, Da-eunJang, Won-HeeAn, SusunCho, Sun-AJung, Mi-SookLee, Ji EunYeo, Kyung-WookKoh, Sang BumJeong, Tae-CheonKang, Mi-JeongChun, Young-JinLee, Su-HyonLim, Kyung-MinBae, SeungJin
Ewha Authors
배승진임경민
SCOPUS Author ID
배승진scopus; 임경민scopus
Issue Date
2017
Journal Title
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
ISSN
0887-2333JCR Link
Citation
vol. 39, pp. 58 - 67
Keywords
Eye irritation testMCIT HCE (TM)ReproducibilityPredictive capacityStatistical analysis
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Indexed
SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Abstract
Here, we report the results of a prevalidation trial for an in vitro eye irritation test (EIT) using the reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium, MCTT HCM (TM) The optimal cutoff to determine irritation in the prediction model was established at 35% with the receiver operation characteristics(ROC) curve for 126 substances. Within lab (WL) and between-lab(BL) reproducibility was tested for 20 reference substances by 3 participating laboratories. Viability data described by mean +/- SD or +/- 1/2 difference between duplicate wells, and scatter plots, demonstrated the WL/BL consistency. WL/BL concordance with the binary decision, whether non-irritant or irritant was estimated to be 85-95% and 95%, respectively. WL/BL reproducibility of viability data was further supported by a strong correlation(ICC, r> 0.9). WL/BL agreement of binary decisions was also examined by Fleiss' Kappa statistics, which showed a strong level of agreement (>0.78), nevertheless weaker than the reproducibility of the viability. The EIT with HCE (TM) exhibited a sensitivity of 82.2% (60/73), a specificity of 81.1% (43/53), and an accuracy of 81.8% (103/126) for 126 reference substances (for liquids; a sensitivity of 100% (47/47), a specificity of 70.6% (24/34), and an accuracy of 87.7% (71/81), and for solids, a sensitivity of 50% (13/26), a specificity of 100% (19/19), and an accuracy of 71.1% (32/45), suggesting that the accuracy is satisfactory but the sensitivity needs improvement, which shall be addressed through correcting the poor sensitivity for solid substances in future full validation trials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI
10.1016/j.tiv.2016.11.010
Appears in Collections:
약학대학 > 약학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE