View : 19 Download: 0

Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: A multicenter randomized single-blinded trial

Title
Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: A multicenter randomized single-blinded trial
Authors
Kim H.G.Huh K.C.Koo H.S.Kim S.-E.Kim J.-O.Kim T.I.Kim H.-S.Myung S.-J.Park D.I.Shin J.E.Yang D.-H.Lee S.-H.Lee J.S.Lee C.K.Chang D.K.Joo Y.-E.Cha J.M.Hong S.P.Kim H.J.
Ewha Authors
김성은
SCOPUS Author ID
김성은scopus
Issue Date
2015
Journal Title
Gut and Liver
ISSN
1976-2283JCR Link
Citation
vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 494 - 501
Keywords
Bowel preparationColonoscopyPolyethylene glycolsSodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate
Publisher
Joe Bok Chung
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS; KCI WOS scopus
Abstract
Background/Aims: We investigated whether sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus bisacodyl compares favorably with conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) with respect to bowel cleansing adequacy, compliance, and safety. Methods: We performed a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded study in outpatients undergoing daytime colonoscopies. Patients were randomized into a split preparation SPMC/bisacodyl group and a conventional split PEG group. We compared preparation adequacy using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), ease of use using a modified Likert scale (LS), compliance/satisfaction level using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety by monitoring adverse events during the colonoscopy between the two groups. Results: A total of 365 patients were evaluated by intention to treat (ITT) analysis, and 319 were evaluated by per protocol (PP) population analysis (153 for SPMC/bisacodyl, 166 for PEG). The mean total BBPS score was not different between the two groups in both the ITT and PP analyses (p>0.05). The mean VAS score for satisfaction and LS score for the ease of use were higher in the SPMC/bisacodyl group (p<0.001). The adverse event rate was lower in the SPMC/bisacodyl group than in the PEG group (p<0.05). Conclusions: The SPMC/bisacodyl treatment was comparable to conventional PEG with respect to bowel preparation adequacy and superior with respect to compliance, satisfaction, and safety. © This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI
10.5009/gnl14010
Appears in Collections:
의학전문대학원 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE