Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김성은 | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-29T12:08:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-29T12:08:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | * |
dc.identifier.issn | 1976-2283 | * |
dc.identifier.other | OAK-15255 | * |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/230684 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background/Aims: We investigated whether sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus bisacodyl compares favorably with conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) with respect to bowel cleansing adequacy, compliance, and safety. Methods: We performed a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded study in outpatients undergoing daytime colonoscopies. Patients were randomized into a split preparation SPMC/bisacodyl group and a conventional split PEG group. We compared preparation adequacy using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), ease of use using a modified Likert scale (LS), compliance/satisfaction level using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety by monitoring adverse events during the colonoscopy between the two groups. Results: A total of 365 patients were evaluated by intention to treat (ITT) analysis, and 319 were evaluated by per protocol (PP) population analysis (153 for SPMC/bisacodyl, 166 for PEG). The mean total BBPS score was not different between the two groups in both the ITT and PP analyses (p>0.05). The mean VAS score for satisfaction and LS score for the ease of use were higher in the SPMC/bisacodyl group (p<0.001). The adverse event rate was lower in the SPMC/bisacodyl group than in the PEG group (p<0.05). Conclusions: The SPMC/bisacodyl treatment was comparable to conventional PEG with respect to bowel preparation adequacy and superior with respect to compliance, satisfaction, and safety. © This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | * |
dc.language | English | * |
dc.publisher | Joe Bok Chung | * |
dc.subject | Bowel preparation | * |
dc.subject | Colonoscopy | * |
dc.subject | Polyethylene glycols | * |
dc.subject | Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate | * |
dc.title | Sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: A multicenter randomized single-blinded trial | * |
dc.type | Article | * |
dc.relation.issue | 4 | * |
dc.relation.volume | 9 | * |
dc.relation.index | SCIE | * |
dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | * |
dc.relation.index | KCI | * |
dc.relation.startpage | 494 | * |
dc.relation.lastpage | 501 | * |
dc.relation.journaltitle | Gut and Liver | * |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5009/gnl14010 | * |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000357361100010 | * |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84936995958 | * |
dc.author.google | Kim H.G. | * |
dc.author.google | Huh K.C. | * |
dc.author.google | Koo H.S. | * |
dc.author.google | Kim S.-E. | * |
dc.author.google | Kim J.-O. | * |
dc.author.google | Kim T.I. | * |
dc.author.google | Kim H.-S. | * |
dc.author.google | Myung S.-J. | * |
dc.author.google | Park D.I. | * |
dc.author.google | Shin J.E. | * |
dc.author.google | Yang D.-H. | * |
dc.author.google | Lee S.-H. | * |
dc.author.google | Lee J.S. | * |
dc.author.google | Lee C.K. | * |
dc.author.google | Chang D.K. | * |
dc.author.google | Joo Y.-E. | * |
dc.author.google | Cha J.M. | * |
dc.author.google | Hong S.P. | * |
dc.author.google | Kim H.J. | * |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 김성은(35210756100;57204243828) | * |
dc.date.modifydate | 20240422125929 | * |