View : 47 Download: 0

Validation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents

Title
Validation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents
Authors
Lee C.G.Park H.M.Shin H.J.Moon J.S.Hong Y.M.Kim N.S.Ha I.S.Chang M.J.Oh K.W.
Ewha Authors
홍영미
SCOPUS Author ID
홍영미scopus
Issue Date
2011
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Pediatrics
ISSN
1783-1061JCR Link
Citation
vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 463 - 469
Indexed
SCOPUS scopus
Abstract
Purpose: To validate the Dinamap ProCare 200 blood pressure (BP) monitor against a mercury sphygmomanometer in children 7 to 18 years old in accordance with the 2010 International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension (ESH-IP2) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol. Methods: Forty-five children were recruited for the study. A validation procedure was performed following the protocol based on the ESHIP2 and BHS protocols for children and adolescents. Each subject underwent 7 sequential BP measurements alternatively with a mercury sphygmomanometer and the test device by trained nurses. The results were analyzed according to the validation criteria of ESH-IP2. Results: The mean (±SD) difference in the absolute BP values between test device and mercury sphygmomanometer readings was 1.85±1.65 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and 4.41±3.53 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). These results fulfilled the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criterion of a mean±SD below 5±8 mmHg for both SBP and DBP. The percentages of test device-observer mercury sphygmomanometer BP differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg were 96%, 100%, and 100% for SBP, and 69%, 92%, and 100% for DBP, respectively, in the part 1 analysis; both SBP and DBP passed the part 1 criteria. In the part 2 analysis, SBP passed the criteria but DBP failed. Conclusion: Although the Dinamap ProCare 200 BP monitor failed an adapted ESH-IP2, SBP passed. When comparing BP readings measured by oscillometers and mercury sphygmomanometers, one has to consider the differences between them, particularly in DBP, because DBP can be underestimated. © 2011 by The Korean Pediatric Society.
DOI
10.3345/kjp.2011.54.11.463
Appears in Collections:
의학전문대학원 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE