View : 667 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author홍영미*
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-28T11:08:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-28T11:08:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011*
dc.identifier.issn1783-1061*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-13775*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/229726-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To validate the Dinamap ProCare 200 blood pressure (BP) monitor against a mercury sphygmomanometer in children 7 to 18 years old in accordance with the 2010 International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension (ESH-IP2) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol. Methods: Forty-five children were recruited for the study. A validation procedure was performed following the protocol based on the ESHIP2 and BHS protocols for children and adolescents. Each subject underwent 7 sequential BP measurements alternatively with a mercury sphygmomanometer and the test device by trained nurses. The results were analyzed according to the validation criteria of ESH-IP2. Results: The mean (±SD) difference in the absolute BP values between test device and mercury sphygmomanometer readings was 1.85±1.65 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and 4.41±3.53 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). These results fulfilled the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criterion of a mean±SD below 5±8 mmHg for both SBP and DBP. The percentages of test device-observer mercury sphygmomanometer BP differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg were 96%, 100%, and 100% for SBP, and 69%, 92%, and 100% for DBP, respectively, in the part 1 analysis; both SBP and DBP passed the part 1 criteria. In the part 2 analysis, SBP passed the criteria but DBP failed. Conclusion: Although the Dinamap ProCare 200 BP monitor failed an adapted ESH-IP2, SBP passed. When comparing BP readings measured by oscillometers and mercury sphygmomanometers, one has to consider the differences between them, particularly in DBP, because DBP can be underestimated. © 2011 by The Korean Pediatric Society.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.titleValidation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue11*
dc.relation.volume54*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage463*
dc.relation.lastpage469*
dc.relation.journaltitleKorean Journal of Pediatrics*
dc.identifier.doi10.3345/kjp.2011.54.11.463*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84863083339*
dc.author.googleLee C.G.*
dc.author.googlePark H.M.*
dc.author.googleShin H.J.*
dc.author.googleMoon J.S.*
dc.author.googleHong Y.M.*
dc.author.googleKim N.S.*
dc.author.googleHa I.S.*
dc.author.googleChang M.J.*
dc.author.googleOh K.W.*
dc.contributor.scopusid홍영미(35210025100;55841904000;56063366100)*
dc.date.modifydate20240415130647*
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE