View : 150 Download: 36

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김광현*
dc.contributor.author안현규*
dc.contributor.author문영준*
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-21T16:31:17Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-21T16:31:17Z-
dc.date.issued2026*
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X*
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-39859*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/275873-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the Thulium fiber laser (TFL) and Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy, considering the distinct technical characteristics of these two systems. Materials and Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42023461573), a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted through August 2025. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies comparing TFL and Ho:YAG laser in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management for urolithiasis. The primary outcomes were the stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rates (intraoperative and postoperative). Results: Thirteen studies involving 2217 patients were included. Overall, the TFL group demonstrated a significantly higher SFR compared to the Ho:YAG group (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.06, p = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, TFL showed superior SFR compared to Ho:YAG without pulse modulation (OR = 1.69, p = 0.01) and comparable efficacy to Ho:YAG with pulse modulation (OR = 1.52, p = 0.24). Regarding safety, no significant difference was observed in the intraoperative complication rate (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.35-1.70, p = 0.52) or the postoperative complication rate (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.65-1.60, p = 0.93) between the two groups. Conclusions: TFL provides a superior SFR compared to the Ho:YAG laser overall, a benefit primarily driven by its significant outperformance of standard Ho:YAG systems without pulse modulation. Importantly, TFL demonstrates comparable efficacy to modern Ho:YAG systems equipped with pulse modulation. The safety profile of TFL, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, is comparable to that of the Ho:YAG laser. Our findings suggest that TFL is a highly effective and safe modality for ureteroscopic lithotripsy, offering distinct advantages over standard Ho:YAG lasers while performing comparably to the latest pulse-modulated systems.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherMDPI*
dc.subjectureteroscopy*
dc.subjectlithotripsy*
dc.subjectlaser*
dc.subjecturolithiasis*
dc.subjectthulium*
dc.subjectHolmium*
dc.subjectmeta-analysis*
dc.titleThulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*
dc.typeReview*
dc.relation.issue4*
dc.relation.volume62*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.journaltitleMEDICINA-LITHUANIA*
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina62040644*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001749992100001*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105036804378*
dc.author.googleAhn, Hyun Kyu*
dc.author.googleJeong, Jae Yong*
dc.author.googleMoon, Young Joon*
dc.author.googleKang, Dong Hyuk*
dc.author.googleJung, Hae Do*
dc.author.googleKim, Lawrence*
dc.author.googleKim, Kwang Hyun*
dc.author.googleLee, Joo Yong*
dc.contributor.scopusid김광현(57191527009)*
dc.contributor.scopusid안현규(57200657625)*
dc.contributor.scopusid문영준(60498050200;57580892700)*
dc.date.modifydate20260820154821*


qrcode

BROWSE