Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김광현 | * |
| dc.contributor.author | 안현규 | * |
| dc.contributor.author | 문영준 | * |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-21T16:31:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-21T16:31:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | * |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1010-660X | * |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1648-9144 | * |
| dc.identifier.other | OAK-39859 | * |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/275873 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background and Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the Thulium fiber laser (TFL) and Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy, considering the distinct technical characteristics of these two systems. Materials and Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42023461573), a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted through August 2025. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies comparing TFL and Ho:YAG laser in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management for urolithiasis. The primary outcomes were the stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rates (intraoperative and postoperative). Results: Thirteen studies involving 2217 patients were included. Overall, the TFL group demonstrated a significantly higher SFR compared to the Ho:YAG group (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.06, p = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, TFL showed superior SFR compared to Ho:YAG without pulse modulation (OR = 1.69, p = 0.01) and comparable efficacy to Ho:YAG with pulse modulation (OR = 1.52, p = 0.24). Regarding safety, no significant difference was observed in the intraoperative complication rate (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.35-1.70, p = 0.52) or the postoperative complication rate (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.65-1.60, p = 0.93) between the two groups. Conclusions: TFL provides a superior SFR compared to the Ho:YAG laser overall, a benefit primarily driven by its significant outperformance of standard Ho:YAG systems without pulse modulation. Importantly, TFL demonstrates comparable efficacy to modern Ho:YAG systems equipped with pulse modulation. The safety profile of TFL, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, is comparable to that of the Ho:YAG laser. Our findings suggest that TFL is a highly effective and safe modality for ureteroscopic lithotripsy, offering distinct advantages over standard Ho:YAG lasers while performing comparably to the latest pulse-modulated systems. | * |
| dc.language | English | * |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | * |
| dc.subject | ureteroscopy | * |
| dc.subject | lithotripsy | * |
| dc.subject | laser | * |
| dc.subject | urolithiasis | * |
| dc.subject | thulium | * |
| dc.subject | Holmium | * |
| dc.subject | meta-analysis | * |
| dc.title | Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | * |
| dc.type | Review | * |
| dc.relation.issue | 4 | * |
| dc.relation.volume | 62 | * |
| dc.relation.index | SCIE | * |
| dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | * |
| dc.relation.journaltitle | MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | * |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/medicina62040644 | * |
| dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:001749992100001 | * |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-105036804378 | * |
| dc.author.google | Ahn, Hyun Kyu | * |
| dc.author.google | Jeong, Jae Yong | * |
| dc.author.google | Moon, Young Joon | * |
| dc.author.google | Kang, Dong Hyuk | * |
| dc.author.google | Jung, Hae Do | * |
| dc.author.google | Kim, Lawrence | * |
| dc.author.google | Kim, Kwang Hyun | * |
| dc.author.google | Lee, Joo Yong | * |
| dc.contributor.scopusid | 김광현(57191527009) | * |
| dc.contributor.scopusid | 안현규(57200657625) | * |
| dc.contributor.scopusid | 문영준(60498050200;57580892700) | * |
| dc.date.modifydate | 20260820154821 | * |