View : 142 Download: 0

Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein as a potential biomarker for differentiating amyloid-negative subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment

Title
Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein as a potential biomarker for differentiating amyloid-negative subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment
Authors
Yoon, Bora; Lee, Hyuk-je; Chae, Hyojin; Oh, Eun-Jee; Hong, Yun Jeong; Jeong, Jee Hyang; Park, Kee Hyung; Kim, Sangyun; Wang, Min Jeong; Choi, Seong Hye; Ryu, Ji Sun; Kang, Sungmin; Yang, Dong Won
Ewha Authors
정지향
SCOPUS Author ID
정지향scopusscopus
Issue Date
2026
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
ISSN
1387-2877JCR Link

1875-8908JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1961 - 1970
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-negative; glial fibrillary acidic protein; mild cognitive impairment; plasma biomarkers; subjective cognitive decline
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: Differentiating subjective cognitive decline (SCD) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in amyloid-negative (A-) individuals is clinically relevant for early evaluation along the Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathway. Objective: To assess whether plasma biomarkers discriminate between A-SCD and A-MCI and compare their performance. Methods: We studied 114 amyloid PET-negative participants (93 A-SCD, 21 A-MCI) aged >= 60 years from multicenter cohorts. Plasma A beta(42)/A beta(40) ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), and phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181) were measured using Simoa. Associations with MCI were estimated with logistic regression; discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis with AUCs and pairwise AUC comparisons using 1000 bootstrap resamples. Results: Standardized log (GFAP) was associated with MCI in univariate analysis (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.35-4.00; p = 0.002) and after adjustment for age and sex (OR 2.45; 1.27-4.74; p = 0.008). GFAP showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.71; 0.59-0.82), whereas A beta(42)/A beta(40), NFL, and pTau181 did not. Pairwise AUC differences favored GFAP over A beta(42)/A beta(40) (Delta AUC 0.34; p = 0.020), NFL (0.21; p = 0.032), and pTau181 (0.29; p = 0.005). Conclusions: In this A- cohort, plasma GFAP was the most informative biomarker for distinguishing MCI from SCD, likely reflecting astrocytic activation. Given modest accuracy and limited disease specificity, GFAP may be most useful as part of a multimodal panel rather than a stand-alone test.
DOI
10.1177/13872877261427806
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE