View : 160 Download: 0
Prognostic value and adjuvant treatment outcomes for the use of the JGOG prognostic model in early-stage intermediate-risk cervical cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 1028)
- Title
- Prognostic value and adjuvant treatment outcomes for the use of the JGOG prognostic model in early-stage intermediate-risk cervical cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 1028)
- Authors
- Kim, Uisuk; Bae, Jaekyung; Paik, E. Sun; Lim, Myong Cheol; Kim, Moon-Hong; Kim, Yun Hwan; Seong, Seok Ju; Suh, Dong Hoon; Lee, Jong-Min; Lee, Chulmin; Choi, Chel Hun; Kang, Sokbom
- Ewha Authors
- 김윤환
- SCOPUS Author ID
- 김윤환

- Issue Date
- 2026
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- ISSN
- 2005-0380
2005-0399
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY vol. 37, no. 3
- Keywords
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Disease-Free Survival; Adjuvant Radiotherapy
- Publisher
- KOREAN SOC GYNECOLOGY ONCOLOGY &
COLPOSCOPY
- Indexed
- SCIE; SCOPUS

- Document Type
- Article
- Abstract
- Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a new Japanese risk grouping in the Korean population and to identify the group benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: A total of 561 patients with stage IB cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2008 across 9 Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group-affiliated institutions were included in this study. Patients had at least one intermediate-risk factor: lymphovascular space invasion, outer one-third of the deep cervical stromal invasion, or a tumor 4 cm or larger. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed based on adjuvant therapies: no treatment, radiation therapy, concurrent chemoradiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. Results: Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their histologically-incorporated intermediate risk factors. Group 1 included patients with limited risk factors (n=385, 68.6%), group 2 (n=106, 18.9%), and group 3 (n=70, 12.5%) had increasing risk. DFS differed across groups (group 1 vs. group 2, p=0.048; group 2 vs. group 3, p=0.030). Group 1 showed no DFS benefit from adjuvant treatment, while in groups 2 and 3, receiving radiation therapy improved DFS (group 2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.01-0.80; p=0.031 and group 3: aHR=0.21; 95% CI=0.04-1.08; p=0.047). In group 3,receiving concurrent chemotherapy treatment did not significantly affect DFS compared to radiation alone (aHR=0.84; 95% CI=0.11-6.30; p=0.861). Conclusion: This study revealed the prognostic value of histology-incorporated intermediate-risk stratification for early-stage cervical cancer in the Korean population. Unlike the results seen in Japanese populations, adjuvant treatment benefited higher-risk patients in terms of DFS.
- DOI
- 10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e59
- Appears in Collections:
- 의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML