View : 160 Download: 0

Prognostic value and adjuvant treatment outcomes for the use of the JGOG prognostic model in early-stage intermediate-risk cervical cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 1028)

Title
Prognostic value and adjuvant treatment outcomes for the use of the JGOG prognostic model in early-stage intermediate-risk cervical cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 1028)
Authors
Kim, Uisuk; Bae, Jaekyung; Paik, E. Sun; Lim, Myong Cheol; Kim, Moon-Hong; Kim, Yun Hwan; Seong, Seok Ju; Suh, Dong Hoon; Lee, Jong-Min; Lee, Chulmin; Choi, Chel Hun; Kang, Sokbom
Ewha Authors
김윤환
SCOPUS Author ID
김윤환scopus
Issue Date
2026
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
ISSN
2005-0380JCR Link

2005-0399JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY vol. 37, no. 3
Keywords
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Disease-Free Survival; Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Publisher
KOREAN SOC GYNECOLOGY ONCOLOGY &

COLPOSCOPY
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a new Japanese risk grouping in the Korean population and to identify the group benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: A total of 561 patients with stage IB cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2008 across 9 Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group-affiliated institutions were included in this study. Patients had at least one intermediate-risk factor: lymphovascular space invasion, outer one-third of the deep cervical stromal invasion, or a tumor 4 cm or larger. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed based on adjuvant therapies: no treatment, radiation therapy, concurrent chemoradiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. Results: Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their histologically-incorporated intermediate risk factors. Group 1 included patients with limited risk factors (n=385, 68.6%), group 2 (n=106, 18.9%), and group 3 (n=70, 12.5%) had increasing risk. DFS differed across groups (group 1 vs. group 2, p=0.048; group 2 vs. group 3, p=0.030). Group 1 showed no DFS benefit from adjuvant treatment, while in groups 2 and 3, receiving radiation therapy improved DFS (group 2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.01-0.80; p=0.031 and group 3: aHR=0.21; 95% CI=0.04-1.08; p=0.047). In group 3,receiving concurrent chemotherapy treatment did not significantly affect DFS compared to radiation alone (aHR=0.84; 95% CI=0.11-6.30; p=0.861). Conclusion: This study revealed the prognostic value of histology-incorporated intermediate-risk stratification for early-stage cervical cancer in the Korean population. Unlike the results seen in Japanese populations, adjuvant treatment benefited higher-risk patients in terms of DFS.
DOI
10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e59
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE