View : 301 Download: 121

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김윤환*
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T16:30:05Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-13T16:30:05Z-
dc.date.issued2026*
dc.identifier.issn2059-7029*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-39318*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/275165-
dc.description.abstractBackground The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy; however, the optimal dose and dosing schedule of cisplatin remain debated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) versus those of tri-weekly cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) during radiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and methods In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 314 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer, randomly assigning them in a 1 : 1 ratio into two arms. The weekly arm received a weekly dose of 40 mg/m(2) cisplatin for six cycles, whereas the tri-weekly arm received a tri-weekly dose of 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin for three cycles, both concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoints included 3-year recurrence-free survival according to a superiority design, with P < 0.05 indicative of statistical significance. Overall survival, toxicity profiles, and quality of life (QOL) were also analyzed. Results Chemotherapy delay was more frequent in the weekly arm than in the tri-weekly arm (P = 0.008). However, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate between the two arms did not significantly differ (78.7% in the weekly arm, 84.1% in the tri-weekly arm; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32, P = 0.28). The pattern of recurrence did not differ significantly between the two arms. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities occurred less frequently in the tri-weekly arm (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the tri-weekly arm had better QOL scores across several domains compared with the weekly arm. Conclusion In this study, tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy was not statistically superior to a weekly schedule in terms of survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the tri-weekly regimen exhibited a more favorable toxicity profile and improved QOL compared with the weekly regimen. These results suggest tri-weekly cisplatin administration as a feasible alternative for chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherELSEVIER*
dc.subjectcervical cancer*
dc.subjectchemoradiotherapy*
dc.subjectcisplatin*
dc.subjectweekly*
dc.subjecttri-weekly*
dc.subjectquality of life*
dc.titleA randomized phase III clinical trial of weekly versus tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the TACO (GCIG/KGOG 1027/THAI 2012) study*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue4*
dc.relation.volume11*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.journaltitleESMO OPEN*
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106102*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001716724800001*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105032419049*
dc.author.googleY. Ryu, S.*
dc.author.googleNam, B. H.*
dc.author.googleKim, M. H.*
dc.author.googleJang, W. I.*
dc.author.googleSitathanee, C.*
dc.author.googleLinh, T. D.*
dc.author.googleLee, K. H.*
dc.author.googleLee, W. M.*
dc.author.googleKim, E. T.*
dc.author.googleKang, S. B.*
dc.author.googleKim, J. H.*
dc.author.googleV. Park, J.*
dc.author.googleLee, K. B.*
dc.author.googleCho, C. H.*
dc.author.googleLou, H.*
dc.author.googleKim, Y. H.*
dc.author.googleKim, Y. T.*
dc.author.googleLee, Y. H.*
dc.author.googleWu, X.*
dc.author.googleKim, J. W.*
dc.author.googlePark, S. I.*
dc.author.googleJeon, S.*
dc.author.googleThinh, D. H.*
dc.author.googleKry, S. F.*
dc.author.googleGaffney, D.*
dc.author.googleSmall, W.*
dc.author.googleWilailak, S.*
dc.contributor.scopusid김윤환(55763947200)*
dc.date.modifydate20261020120519*


qrcode

BROWSE