View : 281 Download: 144

Remimazolam Enables Faster Sedation Induction and Recovery Compared With Midazolam in Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Title
Remimazolam Enables Faster Sedation Induction and Recovery Compared With Midazolam in Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Park, Yehyun; Lee, Jun Kyu; Lee, Kwang Hyuck; Kim, Taejun; Kang, Sun Hyung; Ahn, Dong-Won; Kim, Sung Bum; Kim, Seong-Jung
Ewha Authors
박예현
SCOPUS Author ID
박예현scopus
Issue Date
2026
Journal Title
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL
ISSN
2050-6406JCR Link

2050-6414JCR Link
Citation
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL vol. 14, no. 1
Keywords
benzodiazepine; endoscopy; midazolam; remimazolam; sedation
Publisher
WILEY
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background and Aims: Remimazolam, a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is a safe and effective option for procedural sedation. Nevertheless, to date, no study has directly compared remimazolam and midazolam in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam compared with those of midazolam in this setting. Methods: This multicenter, single-blind, randomized, positive-control, superiority, investigator-initiated phase III trial enrolled patients who were scheduled to undergo diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at seven academic teaching hospitals from April 2023 to January 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to receive remimazolam or midazolam (1:1 ratio). The primary endpoint was total procedure time, defined as the duration from the first sedative administration to discharge. Results: Of 133 randomized patients, 132 (remimazolam group, n = 66; midazolam group, n = 66) underwent upper endoscopy with sedation. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (30.3 vs. 48.5 min, p < 0.001). Sedation-related times (i.e., induction, sedation, recovery, and discharge times) were also significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (all p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups; however, the incidence rates of hypotension, bradycardia, and paradoxical reactions were lower in the remimazolam group. When compared to previous sedation experiences, patient satisfaction was higher in the remimazolam group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with midazolam, the use of remimazolam in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy allows for faster sedation induction and recovery, more rapid discharge, and higher patient satisfaction compared with previous sedation experiences, while maintaining a safety profile similar to that of midazolam.
DOI
10.1002/ueg2.70147
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
UEG Journal - 2025 - Park - Remimazolam Enables Faster Sedation Induction and Recovery Compared With Midazolam in.pdf(961.78 kB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE