View : 256 Download: 479
Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Compared With Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Title
- Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Compared With Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors
- Jang Y.; Park J.; Kang D.; Kim J.; Choi H.; Jeon H.-L.; Lee H.
- Ewha Authors
- 이한길
- SCOPUS Author ID
- 이한길

- Issue Date
- 2026
- Journal Title
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
- ISSN
- 0815-9319
- Citation
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 28 - 40
- Keywords
- gastroesophageal reflux disease; meta-analysis; potassium-competitive acid blockers; proton pump inhibitors; systematic review
- Indexed
- SCIE; SCOPUS

- Document Type
- Review
- Abstract
- Background and Aim: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a novel class of acid suppressants developed to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), providing rapid and sustained acid suppression. While PPI-related adverse events (AEs) are well-documented, safety data on P-CABs remain limited. This study systematically reviewed AEs of P-CABs compared with PPIs, with a meta-analysis focusing on hypergastrinemia. Methods: Following a preregistered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024565011), we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing P-CABs and PPIs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or peptic ulcer disease. Frequently reported AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were qualitatively synthesized; hypergastrinemia was quantitatively analyzed using a random-effects model. Results: Ten RCTs and one observational study were included. Nine studies reported specific AEs, with diarrhea reported in seven studies and constipation, nasopharyngitis, and liver-related events, each reported in three. Most AEs had reporting rates below 5%, except diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract inflammation, which exceeded 5% in both groups. Fracture demonstrated the largest relative difference between the groups, with a threefold higher rate in the P-CAB group. SAEs were observed in fewer than 10% of patients in both groups in most studies. A meta-analysis of six studies showed greater serum gastrin elevation in the P-CAB group compared with the PPI group (mean difference: 130.92 pg/mL, 95% confidence intervals: 36.37–225.47). Conclusions: P-CABs demonstrate a comparable AE risk to PPIs but monitoring for hypergastrinemia and hepatic dysfunction is essential. Further research is required to support safer clinical use. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
- DOI
- 10.1111/jgh.70178
- Appears in Collections:
- 약학대학 > 약학과 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
-
J of Gastro and Hepatol - 2025 - Jang - Safety of Potassium‐Competitive Acid Blockers Compared With Proton Pump Inhibitors.pdf(3.08 MB)
Download
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML