View : 214 Download: 0

Single-step prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third-molar extraction using contrastive learning and Bayesian auto-tuned deep learning model

Title
Single-step prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third-molar extraction using contrastive learning and Bayesian auto-tuned deep learning model
Authors
Yoon K.; Choi Y.; Lee M.; Kim J.; Kim J.-Y.; Kim J.-W.; Choi J.; Park W.
Ewha Authors
김진우; 윤규백
SCOPUS Author ID
김진우scopus; 윤규백scopus
Issue Date
2026
Journal Title
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
ISSN
0250-832XJCR Link
Citation
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 150 - 157
Keywords
cone-beam computed tomography; deep learning; mandibular nerve; molar; oral surgical procedures; third
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Objective Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is a critical complication of mandibular third-molar extraction. This study aimed to construct and evaluate a deep learning framework that integrates contrastive learning and Bayesian optimization to enhance predictive performance using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiographs. Methods A retrospective dataset of 902 panoramic radiographs and 1,500 CBCT images was used. Five deep learning architectures (MobileNetV2, ResNet101D, Vision Transformer, Twins-SVT, and SSL-ResNet50) were trained with and without contrastive learning and Bayesian optimization. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, and comparison with oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs). Results Contrastive learning significantly improved the F1-scores across all models (e.g., MobileNetV2: 0.302 to 0.740; ResNet101D: 0.188 to 0.689; Vision Transformer: 0.275 to 0.704; Twins-SVT: 0.370 to 0.719; SSL-ResNet50: 0.109 to 0.576). Bayesian optimization further enhanced the F1-scores for MobileNetV2 (from 0.740 to 0.923), ResNet101D (from 0.689 to 0.857), Vision Transformer (from 0.704 to 0.871), Twins-SVT (from 0.719 to 0.857), and SSL-ResNet50 (from 0.576 to 0.875). The AI model outperformed OMFSs on CBCT cross-sectional images (F1-score: 0.923 vs. 0.667) but underperformed on panoramic radiographs (0.666 vs. 0.730). Conclusions The proposed single-step deep learning approach effectively predicts IAN injury, with contrastive learning addressing data imbalance and Bayesian optimization enhancing model performance. While artificial intelligence surpasses human performance on CBCT images, panoramic radiograph analysis still benefits from expert interpretation. Future work should focus on multi-center validation and explainable artificial intelligence for broader clinical adoption. © 2026 © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology and the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. All rights reserved.
DOI
10.1093/dmfr/twaf069
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE