View : 243 Download: 0

Safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract in cosmetics estimated by threshold of toxicological concern, point of departure, and history of safe consumption

Title
Safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract in cosmetics estimated by threshold of toxicological concern, point of departure, and history of safe consumption
Authors
Cho H.; Koo Y.J.; Lee S.H.; Bae S.; Choi J.; Lim K.-M.
Ewha Authors
배승진; 임경민
SCOPUS Author ID
배승진scopus; 임경민scopus
Issue Date
2026
Journal Title
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
ISSN
0273-2300JCR Link
Citation
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology vol. 164
Keywords
Cosmetics; Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract; History of safe consumption; Next generation risk assessment (NGRA); Safety assessment; Sea buckthorn; Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC)
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46 % of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients. © 2025 Elsevier Inc.
DOI
10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961
Appears in Collections:
약학대학 > 약학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE