View : 399 Download: 0

Effectiveness of intradiscal ozone injections for treating pain following herniated lumbar disc: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Title
Effectiveness of intradiscal ozone injections for treating pain following herniated lumbar disc: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Chang, Min Cheol; Choo, Yoo Jin; Denis, Isabelle; Mares, Christopher; Majdalani, Carl; Yang, Seoyon
Ewha Authors
양서연
SCOPUS Author ID
양서연scopus
Issue Date
2024
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION
ISSN
1053-8127JCR Link

1878-6324JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1131 - 1139
Keywords
Injections; pain management; intervertebral disc displacement; low back pain; pain; meta-analysis
Publisher
IOS PRESS
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low back pain and sciatica caused by herniated lumbar discs (HLDs) are common complaints among patients visiting pain clinics. Among the various therapeutic methods, intradiscal ozone injections have emerged as an effective alternative or additional treatment option for HLDs. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of intradiscal ozone injections in the treatment of HLDs. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published until January 25, 2024. We included studies that investigated the efficacy of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs. evaluated the methodological quality of individual studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS: At >= 6 months after treatment, the therapeutic effect of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs was greater than that of steroid injections (treatment success rate, 6 months: odds ratio = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.44, 6.39], P < 0.01) or conventional medications (changes in the Visual Analog Scale [VAS], 6 months: standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.65, 95% CI [1.08, 2.22], P < 0.01; 12 months: SMD = 1.52, 95% CI [0.96, 2.08], P < 0.01) but similar to that microdiscectomy (changes in VAS, 18 months: SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI [-0.67, - 0.67, 0.57], P = 0.87). At < 6 months after treatment, the reduction in the VAS score after intradiscal ozone injections was higher than that after steroid injections (changes in VAS, 1 month: SMD = 2.53, 95% CI [1.84, 3.21], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Intradiscal ozone injections may be a useful therapeutic tool in patients with HLDs. Compared with other conventional treatment methods such as steroid injections and oral medications, intradiscal ozone injection has great long-term (>= 6 months) effectiveness.
DOI
10.3233/BMR-240024
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE