View : 703 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author장우진*
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T16:31:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-06T16:31:22Z-
dc.date.issued2023*
dc.identifier.issn1941-7640*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-34489*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/267074-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) demonstrated that intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved clinical outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for patients with complex coronary artery lesions. This study aims to assess whether the prognostic benefit of intravascular imaging-guided procedural optimization persists in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease. METHODS: Of 1639 patients enrolled in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI, 192 patients with left main coronary artery disease were selected for the current prespecified substudy. Selected patients were randomly assigned to either the intravascular imaging-guided PCI group (n=138) or the angiography-guided PCI group (n=54). The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range 1.1 to 3.0 years), intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower incidence of primary end point compared with angiography-guided PCI (6.8% versus 25.1%; hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.76]; P=0.010). This significant reduction in primary end point was mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death or spontaneous target vessel-related myocardial infarction (1.6% versus 12.7%; hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.03-0.82]; P=0.028). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was independently associated with a lower risk of primary end point, even after adjusting for various clinical factors (hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12-0.72]; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery disease in reducing the risk of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872. © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins*
dc.subjectangiography*
dc.subjectcoronary artery*
dc.subjectpatients*
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary intervention*
dc.subjectprognosis*
dc.titleClinical Benefit of Intravascular Imaging Compared with Conventional Angiography in Left Main Coronary Artery Intervention*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue12*
dc.relation.volume16*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpageE013359*
dc.relation.journaltitleCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions*
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013359*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001126155700008*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85180079462*
dc.author.googleKwon*
dc.author.googleWoochan*
dc.author.googleLee*
dc.author.googleJoo Myung*
dc.author.googleYun*
dc.author.googleKyeong Ho*
dc.author.googleChoi*
dc.author.googleKi Hong*
dc.author.googleSeung-Jae*
dc.author.googleJong-Young*
dc.author.googleSang Yeub*
dc.author.googleKim*
dc.author.googleSang Min*
dc.author.googleCho*
dc.author.googleJae Young*
dc.author.googleChan Joon*
dc.author.googleAhn*
dc.author.googleHyo-Suk*
dc.author.googleNam*
dc.author.googleChang-Wook*
dc.author.googleYoon*
dc.author.googleHyuck-Jun*
dc.author.googlePark*
dc.author.googleYong Hwan*
dc.author.googleWang Soo*
dc.author.googleJeong*
dc.author.googleJin-Ok*
dc.author.googleSong*
dc.author.googlePil Sang*
dc.author.googleDoh*
dc.author.googleJoon-Hyung*
dc.author.googleJo*
dc.author.googleSang-Ho*
dc.author.googleChang-Hwan*
dc.author.googleKang*
dc.author.googleMin Gyu*
dc.author.googleKoh*
dc.author.googleJin-Sin*
dc.author.googleKwan Yong*
dc.author.googleLim*
dc.author.googleYoung-Hyo*
dc.author.googleYun-Hyeong*
dc.author.googleJin-Man*
dc.author.googleJang*
dc.author.googleWoo Jin*
dc.author.googleChun*
dc.author.googleKook-Jin*
dc.author.googleHong*
dc.author.googleDavid*
dc.author.googleTaek Kyu*
dc.author.googleYang*
dc.author.googleJeong Hoon*
dc.author.googleSeung-Hyuk*
dc.author.googleGwon*
dc.author.googleHyeon-Cheol*
dc.author.googleHahn*
dc.author.googleJoo-Yong*
dc.author.googleYoung Bin*
dc.contributor.scopusid장우진(56522417800)*
dc.date.modifydate20260820133912*
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE