View : 117 Download: 24

Clinical Implication of Concurrent Amplification of MET and FGFR2 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Title
Clinical Implication of Concurrent Amplification of MET and FGFR2 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer
Authors
ByeonSeonggyuJungJaeyunKimSeung TaeKyoung-MeeLeeJeeyun
Ewha Authors
변성규
SCOPUS Author ID
변성규scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
Biomedicines
ISSN
2227-9059JCR Link
Citation
Biomedicines vol. 11, no. 12
Keywords
co-amplificationFGFR2gastric cancerMET
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: c-mesenchymal epithelial transition factor receptor (c-MET) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) amplification have been identified as factors associated with advanced stage and poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). While they are typically considered mutually exclusive, concurrent amplifications have been reported in a small subset of GC patients. Methods: in this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes of GC patients with MET and FGFR2 amplification using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) database cohort at Samsung Medical Center, which included a total of 2119 patients between October 2019 and April 2021. Results: Of 2119 cancer patients surveyed, the number of GC patients was 614 (29.0%). Out of 614 GC patients, 39 (6.4%) had FGFR2 amplification alone, 22 (3.6%) had MET amplification, and 2 GC patients (0.3%) had concurrent FGFR2 and MET amplification. Two patients with concurrent FGFR2 and MET amplification did not respond to first-line chemotherapy. These two patients had significantly shorter overall survival (3.6 months) compared to patients with FGFR2 or MET amplification alone (13.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively) (p = 0.004). Lastly, we tested the existence of FGFR2 and MET in tumor specimens from different organ sites. Initially, the NGS was tested in a primary tumor specimen from stomach cancer, where the MET copy number was 14.1 and the FGFR2 copy number was 5.3. We confirmed that both MET and FGFR2 were highly amplified in the primary tumor using FISH (MET–CEP7 ratio = 5 and FGFR2–CEP7 ratio = 3). However, although the MET copy number was normal in peritoneal seeding using FISH, FGFR2 remained amplified using FISH (FGFR2–CEP7 ratio = 7) with high FGFR2 protein overexpression. Hence, there was intra-patient molecular heterogeneity. Conclusions: our findings suggest that concurrent amplification of FGFR2 and MET in GC patients is associated with clinical aggressiveness and may contribute to non-responsiveness to chemotherapy or targeted therapy. © 2023 by the authors.
DOI
10.3390/biomedicines11123172
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
biomedicines-11-03172.pdf(10.53 MB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE