View : 365 Download: 0

Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05)

Title
Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05)
Authors
Byun H.K.Kim J.S.Chang J.S.Cho Y.Ahn S.-J.Yoon J.H.Kim H.Kim N.Choi E.Park H.Kim K.Park S.-H.Rim C.H.Choi H.S.Oh Y.K.Lee I.J.Shin K.H.Kim Y.B.
Ewha Authors
김규보
SCOPUS Author ID
김규보scopus
Issue Date
2022
Journal Title
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
ISSN
0167-6806JCR Link
Citation
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 553 - 561
Keywords
Breast cancerContemporary treatmentLymphedemaNomogram
Publisher
Springer
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose: We previously constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema following contemporary breast cancer treatment. This nomogram should be validated in patients with different background characteristics before use. Therefore, we aimed to externally validate the nomogram in a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods: Overall, 8835 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery during 2007–2017 were identified. Data of variables in the nomogram and arm lymphedema were collected. The nomogram was validated externally using C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) with 1000 bootstrap samples and by calibration plots. Results: Overall, 1377 patients (15.6%) developed lymphedema. The median time from surgery to lymphedema development was 11.4 months. Lymphedema rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 11.2%, 13.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Patients with lymphedema had significantly higher body mass index (median, 24.1 kg/m2 vs. 23.4 kg/m2) and a greater number of removed nodes (median, 17 vs. 6) and more frequently underwent taxane-based chemotherapy (85.7% vs. 41.9%), total mastectomy (73.1% vs. 52.1%), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (71.9% vs. 54.2%), and regional nodal irradiation (70.7% vs 22.4%) than those who did not develop lymphedema (all P < 0.001). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.7887, and iAUC was 0.7628, indicating good predictive accuracy. Calibration plots confirmed that the predicted lymphedema risks were well correlated with the actual lymphedema rates. Conclusion: This nomogram, which was developed using factors related to multimodal breast cancer treatment and was validated in a large multi-institutional cohort, can well predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
DOI
10.1007/s10549-021-06507-x
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE