View : 329 Download: 0

Nationwide Survey for Current Status of Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea

Title
Nationwide Survey for Current Status of Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea
Authors
Chung H.-S.Park J.S.Shin B.-M.Yoo H.M.Kim H.Cho J.Lee C.H.Ryoo N.H.Kim J.-S.Chung J.-W.Hong K.H.Kim Y.S.Cho Y.-S.
Ewha Authors
정혜선
SCOPUS Author ID
정혜선scopus
Issue Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal of Korean Medical Science
ISSN
1011-8934JCR Link
Citation
Journal of Korean Medical Science vol. 37, no. 5
Keywords
Clostridioides difficile InfectionCultureGlutamate DehydrogenaseLaboratory DiagnosisNucleic Acid Amplification TestSurveyToxin AB Enzyme Immunoassay
Publisher
Korean Academy of Medical Science
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS; KCI WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: The interest in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased, and the choice of assays became wider since the first national survey in Korea on CDI diagnosis in 2015. We conducted a survey of the domestic CDI assays with more varied questions to understand the current situation in Korea. Methods: In April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions. Results: One-hundred and fifty institutions responded to the questionnaire, of which 90 (60.0%) including one commercial laboratory, performed CDI assays. The toxin AB enzyme immunoassay (toxin AB EIA), nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and C. difficile culture, glutamate dehydrogenase assay, alone or in combination with other assays, were used in 75 (84.3%), 52 (58.4%), 35 (36.0%), and 23 (25.8%), respectively, and 65 (73.0%) institutions performed a combination of two or more assays. The sensitivity of toxin AB EIA was more negatively perceived, and that on specificity was more positively perceived. The perception of sensitivity and specificity of NAAT was mostly positive. Perception on the algorithm test projected it as useful but in need of countermeasures. Sixty-three (73.3%) institutions responded that they performed surveillance on CDI. Conclusion: This study provides useful evidence on the current status of CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea as well as on items that require improvement and is thought to aid in standardizing and improving the CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea. © 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. All Rights Reserved.
DOI
10.3346/JKMS.2022.37.E38
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE