View : 758 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor이혜선-
dc.contributor.author우정현-
dc.creator우정현-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T16:31:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-16T16:31:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000148463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000148463en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/256942-
dc.description.abstract본 연구의 목적은 인수인계의 필요성과 중요성, 형태와 사례를 분석 후, 성공적인 사례를 서비스 디자인 면에서 규명해 보고자한다.;Through this study, I have found collaboration and communication are the key factors to contribute to the success of task’s takeover in the company. Also they are emphasized by design thinking in the view of service design, too. I found out a successful case has common key words which are strong team work, team member’s relationship, open mind and interactive communication. There were an accumulative database for them to pursure the value, itself. In addition, the organizational culture has a form of distributed leadership rather than a strong one, which is similar to today's acting system. During the past, many studies focused on task’s takeover itself or the ways how to resolve issues. But I focused the contribution of design thinking in the area of takeover especially in the company and I think this paper has a meaning to broaden the view of thinking to sove the issue regarding the task’s takeover. I understood the design thinking in service design as a logical reasoning approach which uses the mindset to understand the user's needs and to find a solution to solve it. Also I considered the design thinking in service design as a user-centered innovation process that can be applied to various types of problems ranging from service to business model and process. Design Thinking has the value of collaboration and exchange. It is not just about creating ideas and running them quickly, but about working together in a diverse group of different thinkers. I wanted this paper would help solving the issues related to the task’s takeover in that view. The scope of this study was limited to companies and I researched the literatures. I could compare the common things and differences in factors such as laws, data, culture, managerial style, organizational type and etc. Through grouping and categorizing, I have summarized the common points of success cases. After that, I re-compared Mayo Clinic’s case which improved the process by the service design. It is hoped that this research contributes to various attempts to complement the gap between current problems and future goals by design thinking, rather than focusing on partial improvement of the task, on the issues related to the takeover of companies. Soon, wide variety of approaches by the design thinking in the view of service design are considered to contribute to solving the takeover problem.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. 서론 1 A. 연구의 목적과 의의 1 B. 연구의 방법과 범위 2 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 3 A. 인수인계의 개념 및 용어 정의 3 B. 인수인계의 중요성 5 1. 인수인계 부재 시의 문제점 5 2. 효율적인 인수인계의 필요성 5 C. 인수인계에 영향을 주는 요인들 6 1. 법규 및 의무 6 2. 데이터(Data)활용 6 3. 문화 및 조직 문화 7 4. 관리자 8 5. 조직유형 9 Ⅲ. 사례분석 18 A. 잘못된 사례 18 B. 잘된 사례 Mayo Clinic 18 1. 메이요 클리닉의 과거와 현재 18 2. 서비스 디자인 측면에서 분석한 Mayo Clinic 19 C. 잘된 사례 이스라엘 키부츠 23 D. 잘된 사례 한국의 두레와 품앗이 24 Ⅳ. 서비스 디자인 씽킹이 인수인계에 주는 영향 27 A. 원활한 인수인계에 영향을 미치는 요인 27 B. 서비스 디자인 적용 사례 29 C. 원활한 인수인계에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 메이요 클리닉에 적용 32 Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의 35 A. 결과의 요약 및 논의 35 B. 연구의 한계 및 제언 36 참고문헌 37-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent732650 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 디자인대학원-
dc.subject.ddc600-
dc.title업무 인수인계의 서비스디자인 관점의 고찰-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.title.translatedReview of taking over in the view of Service Design-
dc.format.pagev, 46 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major디자인대학원 서비스디자인전공-
dc.date.awarded2018. 2-
Appears in Collections:
디자인대학원 > 서비스디자인전공 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE