View : 523 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author홍승은*
dc.contributor.author우주현*
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T16:30:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-03T16:30:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020*
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-28226*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/255564-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The funnel has been used in esthetic breast surgery that requires a small incision. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have led to more cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through periareolar incision. However, prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is almost impossible with the periareolar approach. Funnels can also be useful for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: NSM with periareolar incision and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction were performed with prepectoral implant placement between January 2017 and July 2019. The ADM full-wrapped anatomic textured implant was inserted using a funnel without additional incisions during surgery. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 2 who received bilateral breast reconstruction. All operations were successfully performed using funnels with minimal periareolar incisions. Anatomic textured implants (mean: 251.7 cc, range: 90–450 cc) wrapped in ADM can be effectively inserted in the prepectoral plane using a funnel. Two patients experienced delayed wound healing of the areola that was treated by conservative wound management. Patients also experienced less pain overall, and the cosmetic result was very good. Patient satisfaction scores were also very high. Conclusions: While the periareolar incision is esthetically pleasing, additional resection is often necessary. However, the use of funnels ensured that no additional incision was needed even in large implants. This subsequently led to better results in terms of pain and scarring. Prepectoral breast reconstruction involving complete implant coverage with ADM using a funnel through the periareolar approach represents a good alternative to the traditional dual plane subpectoral method. This method provides good patient satisfaction without adverse outcomes. © 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone*
dc.subjectAcellular dermal matrix*
dc.subjectBreast reconstruction*
dc.subjectFunnel*
dc.subjectPeriareolar incision*
dc.subjectPrepectoral reconstruction*
dc.subjectSilicone implant*
dc.titleFunnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue11*
dc.relation.volume73*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage2016*
dc.relation.lastpage2024*
dc.relation.journaltitleJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery*
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.078*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000583316100014*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85090727428*
dc.author.googleWoo J.*
dc.author.googleSeung I.H.*
dc.author.googleHong S.E.*
dc.contributor.scopusid홍승은(56734826200)*
dc.contributor.scopusid우주현(56211277800)*
dc.date.modifydate20240318132538*
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE