Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김윤진 | * |
dc.contributor.author | 우재희 | * |
dc.contributor.author | 조수영 | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-16T16:30:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-16T16:30:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | * |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2253 | * |
dc.identifier.other | OAK-26510 | * |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/253526 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) can be performed with either a single-space technique or a double-space technique for cesarean section. We performed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on sensory block level and side effects. Methods Parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 20) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 20). In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace. In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. Results There were no differences in time to readiness or intraoperative level of sensory block between the two groups. The postoperative sensory level was maintained at a higher level in the double group than in the single group (1 h postoperatively, P = 0.029; 6 h postoperatively, P = 0.016). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. The parturient satisfaction scores 48 h postoperatively were significantly different between groups (9.5 in the double group vs. 8 in the single group, P = 0.004). Conclusions We conclude that there were no differences in intraoperative variables between the double-space technique and the single-space technique for CSEA. However, double-space CSEA for cesarean section may be beneficial for controlling postoperative pain and improving parturient satisfaction. | * |
dc.language | English | * |
dc.publisher | BMC | * |
dc.subject | Cesarean section | * |
dc.subject | Combined spinal-epidural technique | * |
dc.subject | Obstetric anesthesia | * |
dc.subject | Patient satisfaction | * |
dc.subject | Regional anesthesia | * |
dc.title | A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section | * |
dc.type | Article | * |
dc.relation.issue | 1 | * |
dc.relation.volume | 20 | * |
dc.relation.index | SCIE | * |
dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | * |
dc.relation.journaltitle | BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | * |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12871-020-0948-7 | * |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000512025100003 | * |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85078712724 | * |
dc.author.google | Chun, Eun Hee | * |
dc.author.google | Cho, Sooyoung | * |
dc.author.google | Woo, Jae Hee | * |
dc.author.google | Kim, Youn Jin | * |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 김윤진(35069757100) | * |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 우재희(39162370700) | * |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 조수영(36815662300) | * |
dc.date.modifydate | 20240222154111 | * |