View : 530 Download: 0

Thrombus Volume as a Predictor of Nonrecanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke

Title
Thrombus Volume as a Predictor of Nonrecanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke
Authors
Yoo, JoonsangBaek, Jang-HyunPark, HyungjongSong, DongbeomKim, KyoungsubHwang, In GunKim, Young DaeKim, Seo HyunLee, Hye SunAhn, Seong HwanCho, Han-JinKim, Gyu SikKim, JinkwonLee, Kyung-YulSong, Tae-JinChoi, Hye-YeonNam, Hyo SukHeo, Ji Hoe
Ewha Authors
송태진
SCOPUS Author ID
송태진scopus
Issue Date
2018
Journal Title
STROKE
ISSN
0039-2499JCR Link

1524-4628JCR Link
Citation
STROKE vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2108 - 2115
Keywords
cerebral infarctioncomputed tomography angiographystrokethrombus
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &

WILKINS
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background and Purpose-We investigated whether measuring the volume and density of a thrombus could predict nonrecanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. Methods-This study included a retrospective cohort to develop a computed tomography marker of thrombus for predicting nonrecanalization after intravenous thrombolysis and a prospective multicenter cohort for validation of this marker. The volume and density of thrombus were measured semiautomatically using 3-dimensional software on a baseline thin-section noncontrast computed tomography (1 or 1.25 mm). Recanalization was assessed on computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography immediately after intravenous thrombolysis or conventional angiography in patients who underwent further intra-arterial treatment. Nonrecanalization was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 0, 1, 2a. Results-In the retrospective cohort, 162 of 214 patients (76.7%) failed to achieve recanalization. The thrombus volume was significantly larger in patients with nonrecanalization than in those with successful recanalization (149.5 +/- 127.6 versus 65.3 +/- 58.3 mm(3); P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, thrombus volume was independently associated with nonrecanalization (P<0.001). The cutoff for predicting nonrecanalization was calculated as 200 mm(3). In the prospective multicenter validation study, none of the patients with a thrombus volume >= 200 mm(3) among 78 enrolled patients achieved successful recanalization. The positive and negative predictive values were 95.5 and 29.4 in the retrospective cohort 100 and 23.3 in the prospective validation cohort, respectively. The thrombus density was not associated with nonrecanalization. Conclusions-Thrombus volume was predictive of nonrecanalization after intravenous thrombolysis. Measurement of thrombus volume may help in determining the recanalization strategy and perhaps identify patients suitable for direct endovascular thrombectomy.
DOI
10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021864
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE