View : 329 Download: 0

Analysis of the legal effect of settlement agreements prepared in medical litigation following plastic surgery in Korea

Title
Analysis of the legal effect of settlement agreements prepared in medical litigation following plastic surgery in Korea
Authors
Kwon J.W.Park B.Y.Kang S.R.Hong S.E.
Ewha Authors
강소라박보영
SCOPUS Author ID
강소라scopus; 박보영scopus
Issue Date
2017
Journal Title
Archives of Plastic Surgery
ISSN
2234-6163JCR Link
Citation
Archives of Plastic Surgery vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 283 - 292
Keywords
Cosmetic surgeryMedical malpractice claimsSettlement agreement
Publisher
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
Indexed
SCOPUS; KCI scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background Settlements between doctors and patients provide a solution to complicated disputes. However, some disputes may be renewed as a result of negligence by both parties. The purpose of this study was to review the legal issues that may potentially arise during the preparation of settlement agreements and to propose a list of requirements for ensuring the effectiveness of these settlement agreements. Methods Data from 287 civil cases concerning aesthetic surgery that took place between 2000 and 2015 were collected from a court database in South Korea. Factors that influenced the effectiveness of settlement agreements were analyzed. Results Among the 287 court precedents, there were 68 cases of covenant not to sue. Eighteen cases were dismissed because the settlement agreements were recognized as effective, and 50 cases were sent forward for judgment on their merits because the agreements were not recognized as effective. The types of surgery and types of complications were classified by frequency. We evaluated the geographical distribution of the precedents, the settlement timing, and the effectiveness and economic impact of the settlements. We found that there was no statistically significant relationship among these factors. Four major factors that made a settlement agreement legally effective were identified, and the data showed that fee-free reoperations were not considered by the court in determining the compensation amount. Conclusions When preparing a settlement agreement, it is advisable to review the contents of the agreement rather than to take the preparation of a settlement agreement per se to be legally meaningful. © 2017 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons.
Show the fulltext
DOI
10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.283
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE