View : 573 Download: 0

Breast Conservation Therapy versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23

Title
Breast Conservation Therapy versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23
Authors
Kim, KyuboPark, Hae JinShin, Kyung HwanKim, Jin HoChoi, Doo HoPark, WonAhn, Seung DoKim, Su SsanKim, Dae YongKim, Tae HyunKim, Jin HeeKim, Jiyoung
Ewha Authors
김규보
SCOPUS Author ID
김규보scopus
Issue Date
2018
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
ISSN
1598-2998JCR Link

2005-9256JCR Link
Citation
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1316 - 1323
Keywords
Triple negative breast neoplasmsBreast conservation therapyMastectomy
Publisher
KOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATION
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS; KCI WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) versus mastectomy for patients with pT1-2N1 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and Methods Using two multicenter retrospective studies on breast cancer, a pooled analysis was performed among 320 patients with pT1-2N1 TNBC. All patients who underwent BCS (n=212) received whole breast RT with or without regional nodal RT, while none who underwent mastectomy (n=108) received it. All patients received taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up periods were 65 months in the BCS+RT group, and 74 months in the mastectomy group. Results The median age of all patients was 48 years (range, 24 to 70 years). Mastectomy group had more patients with multiple tumors (p < 0.001), no lymphovascular invasion (p=0.001), higher number of involved lymph node (p=0.028), and higher nodal ratio. 0.2 (p=0.037). Other characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates of BCS+RT group versus mastectomy group were 94.6% versus 87.7%, 89.5% versus 80.4%, and 95.0% versus 87.8%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.010, p=0.006, and p=0.005, respectively). Conclusion In pT1-2N1 TNBC, breast conservation therapy achieved better locoregional recurrence-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates compared with mastectomy.
DOI
10.4143/crt.2017.575
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE