View : 913 Download: 346

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김규보*
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T01:03:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-01T01:03:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017*
dc.identifier.issn1949-2553*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-20201*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/234646-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H& N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherIMPACT JOURNALS LLC*
dc.subject2D gamma evaluation*
dc.subjectquasi-3D gamma evaluation*
dc.subjectpre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance*
dc.subjectintensity-modulated radiation therapy*
dc.subjectvolumetric modulated arc therapy*
dc.titleCorrelation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue3*
dc.relation.volume8*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage5449*
dc.relation.lastpage5459*
dc.relation.journaltitleONCOTARGET*
dc.identifier.doi10.18632/oncotarget.12279*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000393228400136*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85012030432*
dc.author.googleKim, Jung-in*
dc.author.googleChoi, Chang Heon*
dc.author.googleWu, Hong-Gyun*
dc.author.googleKim, Jin Ho*
dc.author.googleKim, Kyubo*
dc.author.googlePark, Jong Min*
dc.contributor.scopusid김규보(8213302900)*
dc.date.modifydate20240222162403*


qrcode

BROWSE