View : 567 Download: 0

The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent

Title
The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent
Authors
Choi Y.Pae A.Park E.-J.Wright R.F.
Ewha Authors
박은진
SCOPUS Author ID
박은진scopus
Issue Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
ISSN
0022-3913JCR Link
Citation
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 362 - 368
Indexed
SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts may not always increase adhesion, especially on the post/resin-based luting agent interface, which is a weaker interface than the dentin/adhesive interface. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different post surface treatments on the bond strength of a luting agent to a fiber post. Sixty-eight fiber-reinforced posts (D. T. Light-Post) were divided into 4 groups and treated with 1 of the following surface treatment procedures: no treatment (NS) (control), silanization (SA) (Monobond-S), airborne-particle abrasion (AB) (Airsonic Alu-Oxyd), or silanization subsequent to airborne-particle abrasion (AB plus SA). Specimens were bonded with dual-polymerizing resin-based luting material (Variolink II) and stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and the multiple comparisons Scheffé test with Bonferroni correction (α=.05). Shear bond strength of the luting agent to the post was significantly affected by surface treatment (P<.05). Treating the surface of the post with airborne-particle abrasion resulted in a significantly higher bond strength compared with other treatments. There was no significant difference in bond strength between the silanization group and the no treatment group or the silanization plus airborne-particle abrasion group. Airborne-particle abrasion provided a significant increase in bond strength between the post and the luting agent evaluated, without additional treatments. © 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
DOI
10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60078-9
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE