View : 287 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김승철-
dc.contributor.author주웅-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-28T12:08:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-28T12:08:47Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn1048-891X-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-4286-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/219903-
dc.description.abstractBorderline ovarian tumors have a far more favorable clinical course compared to malignant ovarian tumors. To date, the role of 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the differentiation of an ovarian mass remains controversial. Discrepancy between FDG-PET and magnetic resonance (MR) images is rare but may cause a serious dilemma in decision-making. We report a case of a borderline ovarian tumor showing discrepancy between MR and FDG-PET findings. FDG-PET findings may help with the differentiation of ovarian masses when clinical findings are not coincidental. © 2007, IGCS and ESGO.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.titleDiscrepancy between magnetic resonance and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in a case of borderline ovarian tumor-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.issue5-
dc.relation.volume17-
dc.relation.indexSCIE-
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS-
dc.relation.startpage1031-
dc.relation.lastpage1033-
dc.relation.journaltitleInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00923.x-
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000249487500012-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34548668436-
dc.author.googleJu W.-
dc.author.googleKim S.C.-
dc.contributor.scopusid김승철(35264000100)-
dc.contributor.scopusid주웅(8873659700)-
dc.date.modifydate20180329110405-
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE