View : 682 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author방세훈-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-27T04:08:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-27T04:08:20Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0144-8188-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-15819-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/217719-
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the competitive effects of resale price maintenance (RPM) in circumstances in which multiple manufacturers use RPM and distributors have incentives to free-ride on other distributors' pre-sale services, which can be specific to a manufacturer's brand to some extent. In the antitrust literature and practices, RPM solving the free-rider problem is perceived mostly as pro-competitive, while multiple manufacturers' RPM is perceived as anti-competitive based on their collusive incentives. In our circumstances, distributors' services may differentiate manufacturers' brands ex post, as is desired by manufacturers. Thus, despite solving the free-rider problem, multiple manufacturers' RPM may harm consumers by softening inter-brand price competition. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.-
dc.subjectAntitrust policy-
dc.subjectBrand-specific services-
dc.subjectResale price maintenance-
dc.titleBrand-specificity of pre-sale services and inter-brand competition with resale price maintenance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.volume43-
dc.relation.indexSSCI-
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS-
dc.relation.startpage1-
dc.relation.lastpage9-
dc.relation.journaltitleInternational Review of Law and Economics-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.irle.2015.02.006-
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000362610400001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84925402970-
dc.author.googleBang S.H.-
dc.author.googleJin Y.-
dc.contributor.scopusid방세훈(55229421200)-
dc.date.modifydate20210929152502-
Appears in Collections:
사회과학대학 > 경제학전공 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE