View : 516 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명희-
dc.creator김명희-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T02:08:16Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26T02:08:16Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000002782-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/193526-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000002782-
dc.description.abstractThis study, through analysis of question items on the high school level made by teachers following the 6th curriculum and of evaluation status questionnaire, intends to diagnose to what extent the evaluation reflects the curriculum and to propose a reform measure. Summary of the study is as below. First, as suggested in the curriculum of Chinese Language, it is necessary, while minimizing separating type evaluation question items that ask simple linguistic knowledge, to develop integrated evaluation question type that induces an integrated language and communication ability with introducing direct evaluation measure like practical oral testing. Second, while paying close attention to the indiscriminate overall evaluation including broad language understanding and expression capability, it seems necessary to develop effective question items that would evaluate listening and speaking,, for which many schools are unable to practice due to the difficulties in creating proper question items. Third, since current evaluation is heavily focused on the limited range of communication ability around confirming facts, casual and personal relationship, there should be a measure that enables to do fair evaluation over general communication ability. Although evaluation on language ability is done fairly well in regard to individual life and personal relationship for that matter, it seems also urgent to put further emphasis on the cultural aspects, so as to enhance practical language ability via due understanding for the Chinese culture. Fourth, the question items for evaluation requires circumspection since the evaluation by school system is not only critical for method and content of teaching and learning, but also becomes a basis of academic records for going on to colleges or universities. Therefore, question items must be consist of items that may discriminate upper and lower groups of students with a proper degree of difficulty. Also, items must be developed with a pertinence in the content that would fit the purpose and context of the very evaluation. Fifth, from the analysis of questionnaires, it has been found that teacher recognize the importance of communication ability, but point out overcrowding classroom and lack of evaluation time as problems. As for this matter, it seems urgently necessary, on the level of Ministry of Education, to expand training opportunities abroad, to develop teaching method, and evaluation measure and tools accordingly.-
dc.description.tableofcontents제 1 장 서론 = 1 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1 2. 연구의 방법 = 2 3. 연구의 내용과 한계 = 4 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 6 1. 평가의 의의 및 기능 = 6 2. 언어평가의 유형과 문항 형식 = 7 2.1 언어 평가의 유형 = 7 2.2 문항의 형식 = 9 3. 의사소통 능력 평가 = 12 3.1 의사소통 능력의 개념 = 12 3.2 의사소통 능력의 평가 방법 = 13 3.3 의사소통 능력의 평가 내용 = 14 4. 중국어 교육과정과 평가 = 19 4.1 교과의 성격과 목표 = 20 4.2 교과의 내용 = 20 4.3 평가 = 23 5. 연구 도구 = 25 5.1 분리 평가와 통합 평가의 분석 = 25 5.2 영역별 평가 문항 분석 = 27 5.3 의사 소통 기능 항목별 분석 = 29 5.4 문항 양호도 분석 = 31 제 3 장 평가 문항 분석 = 36 1. 유형별 평가 문항 분석 = 36 1.1 분리 평가와 통합 평가 = 37 1.2 선택형과 서답형 = 37 2. 영역별 평가 문항 분석 = 38 2.1 언어 기능별 분석 = 38 2.2 언어 내용별 분석 = 40 3. 의사소통 기능 항목별 분석 = 42 4. 언어 소재별 분석 = 46 5. 문항 양호도 분석 = 47 5.1 문항 난이도와 변별도 분석 = 47 5.2 문항 반응 분포 분석 = 52 5.3 내용 타당도 분석 = 53 제 4 장 고등학교 중국어 평가 현황 분석 = 54 1. 설문 방법 및 절차 = 54 2. 설문 내용 및 분석 결과 = 56 제 5 장 결론 = 68 참고문헌 = 72 부록 = 74 ABSTRACT = 96-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1452595 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 교육대학원-
dc.title의사소통 능력 향상을 위한 중국어 평가 문항에 대한 연구-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major교육대학원 중국어교육전공-
dc.date.awarded2001. 8-
Appears in Collections:
교육대학원 > 중국어교육전공 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE