View : 105 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author우경제*
dc.contributor.author박진우*
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-17T16:31:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-17T16:31:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024*
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-35103*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/268257-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Direct-to-implant (DTI) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are the two most common methods of immediate breast reconstruction. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes between the two methods and to evaluate whether outcomes change over time. Methods: The data of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using DTI or DIEP flaps between July 2017 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who completed the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module at 6 months and > 12 months after reconstruction were analyzed. Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare outcome between DTI and DIEP groups, and serial comparisons were performed. Results: Of 375 patients included in the analysis, 146 patients completed questionnaires > 1 year of follow-up (20.79 ± 8.55 months). The DTI and DIEP groups had 102 (69.9%) and 44 (30.1%) patients, respectively. There were no intergroup differences in the mean scores representing any of the domains at 6 postoperative months. After > 1 year of follow-up, patients who underwent DIEP-flap reconstruction had greater satisfaction with their breast reconstructions (p < 0.001) and greater satisfaction with their overall outcomes (p < 0.001). In the DTI group, satisfaction scores did not change over time in any of the domains. In the DIEP group, however, the mean scores reflecting satisfaction with the breast (p = 0.001), overall outcome (p = 0.045), psychosocial well-being (p = 0.015), and sexual well-being (p = 0.042) significantly increased over long-term follow-up relative to the scores at 6 postoperative months. Conclusions: Patient-reported outcomes improved over time in association with DIEP reconstructions, reflecting higher satisfaction levels than those associated with DTI reconstruction. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2023.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherSpringer*
dc.subjectBreast reconstruction*
dc.subjectBREAST-Q*
dc.subjectDIEP*
dc.subjectDirect-to-implant*
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcomes*
dc.titleSerial Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Direct-to-Implant Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue7*
dc.relation.volume48*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage1352*
dc.relation.lastpage1361*
dc.relation.journaltitleAesthetic Plastic Surgery*
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-023-03505-w*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85165000522*
dc.author.googleLee*
dc.author.googleMi Kyung*
dc.author.googleHwang*
dc.author.googleJi Won*
dc.author.googlePark*
dc.author.googleJin-Woo*
dc.author.googleWoo*
dc.author.googleKyong-Je*
dc.contributor.scopusid우경제(35319271600)*
dc.date.modifydate20240607115721*
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE