View : 277 Download: 41

Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Title
Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Authors
Kim, HyangkyoungKwon, Tae-WonCho, Yong-PilGwon, Jun GyoHan, YoungjinLee, Sang AhKim, Ye-JeeKim, Seonok
Ewha Authors
김향경
SCOPUS Author ID
김향경scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
ISSN
1011-8934JCR Link

1598-6357JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE vol. 38, no. 39
Keywords
Aortic AneurysmAbdominalAneurysmRupturedMortalityComplicationPeroperativeEndovascular Abdominal Aortic RepairOpen Abdomen Techniques
Publisher
KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS; KCI WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates. The present study evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes of Korean patients with rAAA based on national health insurance claims data. Methods: The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was searched retrospectively to identify patients with rAAA who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) from 2009 to 2018. Perioperative (<= 30 days), early postoperative (<= 3 month), and long-term (> 3 month) survival, reinterventions, and complications were assessed. Results: The search identified 1,034 patients with rAAA, including 594 who underwent EVAR and 440 who underwent OSR. When the study period was divided into two, the total numbers of patients with rAAA, patients who underwent EVAR, and octogenarians were higher during the second half. The perioperative mortality rate was 29.8% in the EVAR and 35.0% in the OSR group ( P = 0.028). Hartmann's procedure for bowel infarction was performed more frequently in the OSR than in the EVAR group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-21.84; P = 0.001), but other complication rates did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality during the entire observation period did not differ significantly in the EVAR and OSR groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.087). Abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention rate was significantly lower in the OSR group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.70; P = 0.005). Conclusion: Although EVAR showed somewhat superior perioperative outcomes for rAAA, the long-term outcomes of EVAR after excluding initial 3 months were significantly worse than OSR. When anatomically feasible for both treatments, the perioperative mortality risk and reasonable prospects of long-term survival should be considered in rAAA.
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e321
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
0063JKMS_jkms-38-e321.pdf(1.82 MB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE