View : 117 Download: 0

Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study

Title
Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study
Authors
ChoiMin SeoChangJee SukKimKyuboJin HeeTae HyungSungminChaHyejungChoOyeonJin HwaMyungsooJureeTae GyuYeoSeung-GuAh RamAhnSung-JaJinhyunKangKi MunKwonJeannyKooTaeryoolMi YoungSeo HeeJeongBae KwonJangBum-SupJoIn YoungLeeHyebinNaleeParkHae JinImJung HoSea-WonYeonaSun YoungJi HyunChunJaeheeEung ManJin SungShinKyung HwanYong Bae
Ewha Authors
김규보
SCOPUS Author ID
김규보scopus
Issue Date
2024
Journal Title
Breast
ISSN
0960-9776JCR Link
Citation
Breast vol. 73
Keywords
Auto-contouringBreast cancerDeep learningInter-observer variationRTQA
Publisher
Churchill Livingstone
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. Methods and materials: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. Results: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5–19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. Conclusion: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation. © 2023
DOI
10.1016/j.breast.2023.103599
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE