View : 136 Download: 0

Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis

Title
Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis
Authors
ShinHong KyungParkJin HoonJeonSang RyongRohSung WooJoDae JeanHyunSeung-JaeChoYong-Jae
Ewha Authors
조용재
SCOPUS Author ID
조용재scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
Neurospine
ISSN
2586-6583JCR Link
Citation
Neurospine vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1469 - 1479
Keywords
Adult deformity surgeryComplicationsIliac screwMeta-analysisS2 alar-iliac screwSacropelvic fixation
Publisher
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Objective: Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted. Results: Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p=0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p=0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p<0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p<0.01). Conclusion: IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications. © 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.
DOI
10.14245/ns.2346654.327
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE