View : 174 Download: 40

Rhythm Control and Cardiovascular or Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Study of the CODE-AF Registry

Title
Rhythm Control and Cardiovascular or Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Study of the CODE-AF Registry
Authors
Chung H.-G.Park J.Park J.-K.Kang K.-W.Shim J.Kim J.-B.Kim J.Choi E.-K.Park H.W.Lee Y.S.Joung B.
Ewha Authors
박준범
SCOPUS Author ID
박준범scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal of Clinical Medicine
ISSN
2077-0383JCR Link
Citation
Journal of Clinical Medicine vol. 12, no. 14
Keywords
atrial fibrillationoral anticoagulationprognosisrhythm control
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: It is not clear whether the data regarding rhythm control during atrial fibrillation (AF) contained in AF registries is prognostically significant. Thus, this study investigated the relationship between rhythm control and cardiovascular outcomes in patients in contemporary AF registries. Methods: This study was conducted using data from 6670 patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulation in the CODE-AF registry. We used propensity overlap weighting to account for differences in baseline characteristics between the rhythm control and rate control groups. The primary outcome was a composite of the rate of death due to cardiovascular causes, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. The secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome. Results: In the CODE-AF registry, 5407 (81.1%) patients were enrolled three months after AF diagnosis. During a median follow-up period of 973 days (interquartile range: 755–1089 days), a primary outcome event occurred in 72 patients in the rhythm control group (1.4 events per 100 person-years) and in 211 patients in the rate control group (1.8 events per 100 person-years). However, after overlap weighting, the incidence rates were 1.4 and 1.5 events per 100 person-years, respectively. No significant difference was found in either the primary outcome (weighted HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.66–1.17; p = 0.363) or secondary outcomes between the rhythm control and rate control groups. Conclusion: In a prospective AF registry in which most of the population was enrolled at least three months after AF diagnosis, no difference in the risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular outcomes was found between the rhythm control and rate control groups, suggesting the early rhythm control should be considered to improve the outcome of patients. © 2023 by the authors.
DOI
10.3390/jcm12144579
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
jcm-12-04579.pdf(908.57 kB) Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE