View : 231 Download: 0

Is early mobilization after volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures really beneficial? A meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies

Title
Is early mobilization after volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures really beneficial? A meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies
Authors
Lee, Jun-KuYoon, Byung -HoKim, ByungsooHa, CheungsooKil, MinkyuShon, Jeong InLee, Hyun Il
Ewha Authors
윤병호
SCOPUS Author ID
윤병호scopus
Issue Date
2023
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY
ISSN
0894-1130JCR Link

1545-004XJCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 196 - 207
Keywords
Distal radius fractureVolar locking plateWristRange of motionRehabilitationImmobilization
Publisher
HANLEY &

BELFUS-ELSEVIER INC
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Study design: This was a systematic review with a meta-analysis. Introduction: Despite rising trends toward surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP) fixation, there is a lack of consensus on when to start vigorous wrist range of motionPurpose: We performed a meta-analysis to compare early and late mobilization after VLP fixation in patients with DRF. Methods: Four prospective randomized controlled trials with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were retrieved through MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the KoreaMed databases in March 2021. We divided patients into an early group (patients who started ROM exercises of the wrist within 2 weeks after surgery), and a late group (patients who started ROM exercises 5 or 6 weeks after surgery). The primary outcome was treatment efficacy which was measured through improvement in pain score, function score, ROM, and grip power. The secondary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications.Results: This meta-analysis included 127 patients in the early group and 131 patients in the late group. The outcomes were compared at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference in pain score, though the early group had a lower average visual analog scale score. The early group had a lower arm, shoulder, and hand disability score than the late group (95 % CI, -16.25 to -8.35 points; P < .001) at 6 weeks postoperatively, suggesting significantly superior outcomes. A similar trend persisted at 3 ( n = 74 in the early group and n = 77 in the late group; 95% CI, -5.45 to -0.30; P = .029) and 6 months ( n = 102 in the early group and n = 100 in the late group; 95% CI, -4.81 to 0.21; P = .073), but the differences were smaller. The early group had a higher grip power at all follow-up periods, but the difference was only significant at 6 months postoperatively ( n = 88 in the early group and n = 83 in the late group; 95% CI, 0.50 to 6.99; P = 0.024). The early group also had more favorable ROM in all directions at 6 weeks, but only in supination at 6 months. The complication rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no differences in the rates of secondary operation and reduction loss.
DOI
10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.003|http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.003
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE