View : 495 Download: 0

Foot and Ankle Motion after Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: Comparison with Tibiotalar Arthrodesis Using a Multi-Segment Foot Model

Title
Foot and Ankle Motion after Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: Comparison with Tibiotalar Arthrodesis Using a Multi-Segment Foot Model
Authors
Cao, LinyingKyung, Min GyuPark, Gil YoungHwang, Il-UngKang, Ho WonLee, Dong Yeon
Ewha Authors
강호원
SCOPUS Author ID
강호원scopus
Issue Date
2022
Journal Title
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
ISSN
2005-291XJCR Link

2005-4408JCR Link
Citation
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 631 - 644
Keywords
AnkleArthritisArthrodesisGait analysis
Publisher
KOREAN ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC
Indexed
SCOPUS; KCI WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is an established surgical procedure for treating patients with end-stage ankle joint arthritis and subtalar joint arthritis. Although it greatly relives pain, a major drawback is loss of range of motion. Although it is known to restrict an additional subtalar joint compared to tibiotalar arthrodesis, there is a lack of gait analysis studies comparing the two methods. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in kinematics of the foot and ankle joints between tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. We also compared preoperative and postoperative statuses for each surgical method.Methods: The study included 12 and 9 patients who underwent tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, respectively, and 40 healthy participants were included in the control group. The DuPont foot model was used to analyze intersegmental foot and ankle kinematics during gait.Results: Compared to controls, both tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis resulted in slow gait speed with reduced stride length, increased step width, and decreased range of sagittal plane motion. Both fusion methods showed similar range of mo-tion in all segments and planes following surgery. Coronal positions showed more supination of the forefoot and pronation of the hindfoot segment after each operation, particularly tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Gait after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis did not significantly differ from that after tibiotalar arthrodesis, but there was a tendency of more pronation in the hindfoot segment.Conclusions: Both fusion methods limited foot and ankle motion in similar ways. Comparing tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal ar-throdesis suggests that additionally fusing the subtalar joint does not cause greater movement restriction in patients. Objectively comparing tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis will facilitate further understanding of the effect of tibiotalocalcaneal ar-throdesis on movement and the value of subtalar joint motion for improved preoperative counselling.
DOI
10.4055/cios22034
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE